Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guys,

 

A few of you may have noticed a thread where I had been having evap large leak issues, then a fuel leak issue with my truck.  I finally got all that resolved by replacing all the fuel lines.  Anywho - I went to buy a motorcycle this past weekend.  I went from south Atlanta metro to between Orlando & Tampa to buy the bike.  Turns out it was a turd, so I told the dude to pound sand, and didn't buy it, and rolled back home.  I wanted to just put my $0.02 in when it comes to mpg.

 

The trailer is a simple 875 pound 5' x 10' single axle utility trailer.  I fold the trailer ramp down forward, laying it on the bed of the trailer and strapping it down.  It does have steel grating, but is a fairly big wind drag when the trailer is empty (why I lay it down out of the way).  I ran 70 mph on the way down there and 70 mph on the way back.  I know some of you guys like to cruise at 90 mph, so yeah ... I roll slow.  The good thing is, the traffic was heavy (but moving), and since I was going slower than most (speed limit 70 mph, I was rock steady on GPS verified 70 mph), I never had to back off the cruise.  I just stayed over out of the way the just let it cruise.  I had no issues, I just relaxed and enjoyed the ride.

 

The point being, I averaged 19.00 mpg over the whole trip.  954 miles / 50.208 gallons.  So yeah, you can look at it as I wasted $167 in fuel (true).  But I dodged a much bigger bullet not buying that turd.  The truck ran great.  Had no issues over that trip.  I used A/C maybe 30% of the time (blows ice).  It seems to be running really good ... for now.  The truck is a 4.8L SCSB 2WD.

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, 7milesout said:

Guys,

 

A few of you may have noticed a thread where I had been having evap large leak issues, then a fuel leak issue with my truck.  I finally got all that resolved by replacing all the fuel lines.  Anywho - I went to buy a motorcycle this past weekend.  I went from south Atlanta metro to between Orlando & Tampa to buy the bike.  Turns out it was a turd, so I told the dude to pound sand, and didn't buy it, and rolled back home.  I wanted to just put my $0.02 in when it comes to mpg.

 

The trailer is a simple 875 pound 5' x 10' single axle utility trailer.  I fold the trailer ramp down forward, laying it on the bed of the trailer and strapping it down.  It does have steel grating, but is a fairly big wind drag when the trailer is empty (why I lay it down out of the way).  I ran 70 mph on the way down there and 70 mph on the way back.  I know some of you guys like to cruise at 90 mph, so yeah ... I roll slow.  The good thing is, the traffic was heavy (but moving), and since I was going slower than most (speed limit 70 mph, I was rock steady on GPS verified 70 mph), I never had to back off the cruise.  I just stayed over out of the way the just let it cruise.  I had no issues, I just relaxed and enjoyed the ride.

 

The point being, I averaged 19.00 mpg over the whole trip.  954 miles / 50.208 gallons.  So yeah, you can look at it as I wasted $167 in fuel (true).  But I dodged a much bigger bullet not buying that turd.  The truck ran great.  Had no issues over that trip.  I used A/C maybe 30% of the time (blows ice).  It seems to be running really good ... for now.  The truck is a 4.8L SCSB 2WD.

What I get of the story and what I live by. Never go over 100 miles for any purchase. Especially any vehicle. Something will always show up in that range. Too good to be true usually is.

Posted

You're right.  I agree with you 99%.  The only 1% exception was that this was / is a rare motorcycle.  It felt like it had been crashed.  And there were some other suspicious issues, so I just walked away.  But yeah, you are right.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...