Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm installing two oil catch cans, one on each side of the engine. My vehicle VIN is: 1GCUWDED8KZ130481

 

I noticed the passenger side breather hose was much oilier than the driver's side PCV hose. This makes me wonder where my PCV is actually located. My ride is a 2019 5.3 Liter Silverado 1500, RST, (New Style). I cannot get any two respondants to my query to agree with each other where the PCV is. Why is this so hard? Either it's on the left or it's  on the right side of the engine, attached to the TB or it's not, attached to the manifold or it's not. My future as an amateur automobile repair person hangs in the balance.

Edited by Alan D Learned
Did not include year of manufacture
Posted

Your VIN shows a 2019 L84 (5.3)

 

On your 5.3, a closed crankcase ventilation system is used in order to provide a more complete scavenging of the crankcase vapors. Fresh air from the throttle body is supplied to the crankcase, mixed with blow-by gases, and then passed through a crankcase flow-controlled ventilation fitting into the intake manifold.

 

The primary control is through the crankcase ventilation fitting located in the front of the left rocker arm cover. This fitting is equipped with a flow control nozzle which meters the air flow at a rate depending on manifold vacuum. To maintain idle quality, the flow control nozzle restricts the flow when intake manifold vacuum is high. If abnormal operating conditions arise, the system is designed to allow excessive amounts of blow-by gases to back flow through the crankcase vent tube into the engine air inlet to be consumed by normal combustion.

 

Filtered fresh air is routed from the air inlet system to the front of the right rocker arm cover via a formed nylon tube. To reduce the potential of oil pullover due to back flow of the ventilation system, the fittings in the rocker arm covers are shielded from the rocker arms. From there fresh air and gases are routed through the crankcase and up through a metered PCV fitting on the front of the left rocker arm cover. Foul air is then routed into the left side of the intake manifold via a formed nylon tube."

Posted (edited)

I follow finally. Apparently based on my further reading on this subject my L84 model does not utilize PCVs per se, but opts instead for single-piece metal orifices resembling PCVs that redirect all gasses back up through the airbox plenum, manifold and subsequently the piston chambers bridging the two valve covers with appropriately sized rubber hoses, using a CSS ("cylinder support system") to the driver's side of the air plenum, and capping the passenger side of the plenum. This information went a very long way in explaining the mystery and offered a subsequent direction I need to go with my oil catch can connections. The direction of gasses would be better maintained with the judicious use of single direction check valves. Thanks!

Edited by Alan D Learned
Correction
Posted (edited)
On 7/12/2023 at 3:08 AM, Gangly said:

Your VIN shows a 2019 L84 (5.3)

 

On your 5.3, a closed crankcase ventilation system is used in order to provide a more complete scavenging of the crankcase vapors. Fresh air from the throttle body is supplied to the crankcase, mixed with blow-by gases, and then passed through a crankcase flow-controlled ventilation fitting into the intake manifold.

 

The primary control is through the crankcase ventilation fitting located in the front of the left rocker arm cover. This fitting is equipped with a flow control nozzle which meters the air flow at a rate depending on manifold vacuum. To maintain idle quality, the flow control nozzle restricts the flow when intake manifold vacuum is high. If abnormal operating conditions arise, the system is designed to allow excessive amounts of blow-by gases to back flow through the crankcase vent tube into the engine air inlet to be consumed by normal combustion.

 

Filtered fresh air is routed from the air inlet system to the front of the right rocker arm cover via a formed nylon tube. To reduce the potential of oil pullover due to back flow of the ventilation system, the fittings in the rocker arm covers are shielded from the rocker arms. From there fresh air and gases are routed through the crankcase and up through a metered PCV fitting on the front of the left rocker arm cover. Foul air is then routed into the left side of the intake manifold via a formed nylon tube."

Thank you for the advice, sir. Visit the virtual refuge lauded by CasinosAnalyzer at https://casinosanalyzer.com/online-casinos/redcherry.casino to go on an exciting voyage. Get ready to release your inner gambler with its legal status, fascinating games, and steadfast dedication to player safety. 

Edited by KarenRoe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 350 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...