Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Ever since I bought my truck new it’s been a weirdo. Intermittent loss of connection with CarPlay until I shut it off open the door and let it time out, Intermittent loss of backup camera guide lines, intermittent vibration at interstate speeds and at the same speed later in the day no vibration.

Lately the spirits have been angry. One day I started the truck with Chevy app and when I turned on the ignition I got alerts that my abs system failed and top speed was reduced to 62 mph. Again, turning it off opening the door and letting it time out problem gone.
Today I tried to start it and it acted like the battery was dead. Wouldn’t turn over and each attempt yielded a weaker click. I jumped it with the wife’s car and it started (under light protest). Drive it to auto zone and the battery, alternator and starter check out fine. Now I’m noticing the ac is blowing out the vents and floor vents even with floor off. If I select floor only it does floor only but regular vent does both now. Wtf??!!
 

Edited by IndMechJeff
Posted (edited)

Added features / options on newer vehicles equal added complexity, more wiring, and more ways things can fail. Prime example of that right here.

 

Impossible to diagnose with the limited info. We'd have to see codes, if any, and live data from a scan tool to even glance at the potential issue. That said, my guess is you've got something bringing down one of the many communication networks on these machines.

 

Then, there's the possibility that this is all just piss-poor build quality and nothing is wrong electrically. Having several systems fail all at the same time on a 5 year old 21st century vehicle is not outside the realm of possibility.  Either everything is failing at the same time (possible), or there's a communication issue causing multiple issues (very likely). The fun is figuring out which.

 

If you have limited or zero understanding of high and low speed CAN, MOST bus, and LIN networks, I'd start doing some intensive Google research on a local NON-DEALER (IMPORTANT!!!!!) shop that specializes in electrical gremlins, AND has great reviews - a tall order these days, I know. You might have to have to travel an hour or more to find one. 

 

My best advice? STAY AWAY FROM THE DEALER with this one.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

Thank you so much for the prompt reply. I’m assuming the advice to stay away from the dealerships is suggesting this is a juicy cash grab opportunity for them?

Posted (edited)

Indeed it is! If you've got deep pockets, you won't mind. If you work hard for your money, you'll be livid.

 

Like I always say, this statement isn't to bash all dealer techs - there's some great ones out there. It's more a corporate bashing, since they screw their techs as much as their customers. The pay system encourages speed over thorough diagnostics. To troubleshoot failures like this, speed is the exact OPPOSITE of what you want to be doing.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted (edited)

To expand on this a bit further so people understand ...

 

Say, theoretically, to fix a complex electrical failure it will take a combined 50 hours of troubleshooting, but the book time only pays 3 hours, GM isn't going to give you 47 free hours. They nickel and dime techs TENTHS of an hour over lunch breaks, and walking to the toolbox. 47 hours is absolutely NOT going to happen.

 

So what WILL happen is, they will continue to toss parts at the vehicle until the problem goes away. Sometimes it never does. Those parts are all billed to YOU, along with the associated labor to install them. You can see where this is going ...

 

You can't blame the techs - no one is willing to work for free, so you can't expect them to either.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

Again, thank you so much for taking the time to reply. I had no idea that’s how the dealerships did their techs. Gonna start asking around local mechanics. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,448 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...