Jump to content

04 Duramax/Allison vs. 6.0 PSD Ford


8100 Power

Is the 04 D/A better than 6.0 PSD Ford?  

27 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

In my opinion, both are very good choices. However, since I don't care about automatic transmissions, my vote went to Ford. The PSD is much stronger then the DMax when backed by the 6-speed manual, and the new 04 Dmax does nothing to change that. But, I would have no problem with either one of them.

Posted

Im a bit biased, and im sure mamy people here are. Heard of and seen too many problems with the early 6.0 PSDs, and experienced too many problems with Chrystler in general.

Posted

Do you want a go fast motor or a work motor is the question. If you want the first, chioce is between the two V-8s. If its the latter, 5.9L Cummins, a tractor engine smashed into a pickup, all the way. A straight six will beat a V-8 any day of the week with useable torque, its just in the design.

 

Seeing as how I think of trucks as tools and not toys, you should be able to see my pick. Duramax and PSD are good engines, no doubt about it, but come in a distant 2nd and 3rd for me.

Posted

I agree with JP. I would LOVE to have a Cummins, it is just what surrounds it that I can't deal with.

Posted
I agree with JP.  I would LOVE to have a Cummins, it is just what surrounds it that I can't deal with.

:cheers: Love the motor, can't stand what it's in.

 

Between the Dmax and the ford is a tough one. I love the 6spd ford, but I'm pretty biased towards GM. :chevy:

Posted

A buddy at work has a new F350 with the 6L PSD and it has been a nightmare. When he bought the truck, it wouldn't start and it spent 3 weeks at the dealer while he drove around a Toyota loaner. It ran OK for a couple months and now it started surging at traffic lights. He almost lunged into a couple cars and he's taken to stopping far behind people. The truck is back in the shop again.

Posted

Duramax all the way.

Spent sometime at the dieselplace.com

Dmax just silly with horsepower once juiced,sprayed,and chipped to the max. Still on stock injectors and stock turbo.

Plus dad has a juiced dmax

 

MMMMMMM horsepower MMMMMMMM

 

:cheers:

Posted

I never thought I would be saying this but I'm really leaning towards the Ford - almost to the point that I may trade my Dmax in for one once they refresh the body. The '04, 6.0's seem to have all the major bugs worked out of it. I drove one recently and I must say that it is a nice, nice diesel, and the ride of the F250 was very good and not as stiff as my HD.

 

The Dmax is a fast diesel but its also had a few years head start over the 6.0. Give the 6.0 another year and the aftermarket boys will have all of the go-fast toys ready to run. They better have because right now i'm eating every PS I go up against. :thumbs:

 

GM has my preference when it comes to SUV's, though - nobody comes close. I just wish they offered a Dmax Suburban

Posted

Throw me in for the D*dge crowd.... straight 6 nothing will compare to trq of those d**n six's no matter what they put it in....

 

Besides chip alone in 04 is putting them OVER 1,000 ft pounds.... Sick, just plain sick!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 907 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...