Jump to content

Rear Diff Oil Change


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey Guys,

Went to change the fuel filer today and the rear end fluid. The filter was a piece of cake, but when I went to drain the gear oil, (G80) I couldnt find the drain plug! Can someone help me out here? The only thing I was thinking was that on the 2003 you have to pull the pumpkin cover off to drain?

Also, what tool do you use to open the fill plug?

Thanks, Nick

Posted
Hey Guys,

Went to change the fuel filer today and the rear end fluid. The filter was a piece of cake, but when I went to drain the gear oil, (G80) I couldnt find the drain plug! Can someone help me out here? The only thing I was thinking was that on the 2003 you have to pull the pumpkin cover off to drain?

Also, what tool do you use to open the fill plug?

Thanks, Nick

Most rear axles do not have drain plugs. Just lossen cover and let oil drain out the retighten cover bolts and fill unit.

Posted
my Tahoe has a drain plug

Consider yourself lucky as my 2000 K3500 with bulletproof corp 14 bolt 10.5 ring gear axle does not. Personally, it is not a big issue to me anyway.

Posted

Nope the 10.5" units didn't have them (had to drain the one I put on my Blazer a few times). The newer 11.5" that are on the 2500HD and 3500's have them I believe (need to crawl under mine to double check tho).

Posted

11.5 inch ring gear in a rear end. Now even less ground clearance in standard equipment. I heard than the new 11.5 is cheaper to make because it does not have a straddle mount pinion in a removable pinion carrier like the old 10.5 does. There is a new 10.5 also out that does not have a straddle mount pinion either of the old 14 bolt corp.

Posted

The ground clearance loss (if any) is not really an issue for me. True it does not have the removable pinion that the older 10.5" units had (that was what I put in my Blazer along with a Dana 60 in the front) but has a higher load capacity than the the 10.5" models. It is rated for 11000lbs GAW and 8330 lbft of torque....So not real concerned anything twisting in there... The new factory lockers also work a LOT better than they used to in the old 10.5" models. After dealing with it's "odd engagement" in the 10.5, out it came and in went a Detroit Locker, along with a PowerLok in the front.

Posted
The ground clearance loss (if any) is not really an issue for me. True it does not have the removable pinion that the older 10.5" units had (that was what I put in my Blazer along with a Dana 60 in the front) but has a higher load capacity than the the 10.5" models. It is rated for 11000lbs GAW and 8330 lbft of torque....So not real concerned anything twisting in there... The new factory lockers also work a LOT better than they used to in the old 10.5" models. After dealing with it's "odd engagement" in the 10.5, out it came and in went a Detroit Locker, along with a PowerLok in the front.

I never cared for the "gov loc" that GM uses. IF they changed they just did recently. The gov loc in the 10.5 was pretty durable though if you could live with its operation quirks. GM should have long used the Eaton LSD instead. They could have beefed up the tubes on the 14 bolt to carry more weight like Dana does on the 70 but 11.5" looks better in the numbers game too.

Posted

I hated how that old gov-lok worked I'd get that Blazer sideways quite often with it as you never knew when it would lock up. This newer one (also built by Eaton) is much more dependable and better behaved. Having the discs on the back is also nicer than those planter sized drums on the old one. What I wish is that GM offered a posi for the front end on these IFS units.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
    • you might read through the info on gmupfitter.com for your truck, to find a good power source.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...