Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
There is a lot of good info here

 

http://www.randysringandpinion.com/index.html

 

I think with 33's you should be fine with the stock gears. I have 34's on my HD and tow a 19 ft boat with the stock gears, no problem.

And it is a dog with 3.73 and 34 towing too, do not BS me. OD is worthless too (might as well dump it for a THM400 beacuse you will need it) and that is not fine at all. 4.10 would be border line with 33 and towing with 4.56 even better. Of course he could take you advise and have 25% less pulling power with 3.73 vs 4.56 in a 2wd truck with no lower range to fall back to or he could install 4.56's and reduce tranny strain 25% at any given load and still have a nice 2100 rpm cruise at 65 in OD with a OD that is actually usable.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I'm not sure I have to do it.

Anytime you go bigger in tire size you are sacraficing power, unless you regear. He said "Do I Have To", and the answer is no!!!! Is it a good idea, probably, but there are other ways to spend your money. Exhaust, chips, blowers, intake....

Posted
I'm not sure I have to do it.

Anytime you go bigger in tire size you are sacraficing power, unless you regear. He said "Do I Have To", and the answer is no!!!! Is it a good idea, probably, but there are other ways to spend your money. Exhaust, chips, blowers, intake....

No you do not have to if you want a doggy truck, added driveshaft, transfer case, engine and tranny strain. No wizardry is going to correct this problem short of gear because engine will be turning less RPM at any given speed and be working harder to do it no matter what you do. The torque converter will also ride on the stall longer (making extra heat and wasted fuel) because everything is turning slower but requireing a lot more torque to do it. There is no free lunch here and trucks do not run in a vacum. Bigger tires not only raise effective ratio they add more drag to the mix too from more rolling resitance and increased truck drag from higher hieght. It is a lose lose situation if you do not regear properly. There are those still that have there head in the sand that think you can greatly increase tire size on a truck and have no effect on its operation. Sure, you can leave it like it is and have OD about worthless and use second on long hills on interstate pulling a heavy trailer (not me) and shorten tranny life and blame GM when tranny fails or you can regear it and have the truck run the way it was meant to be and a OD that really works properly. Belive me new gears are cheaper than chips, mods, dual exhaust and a new tranny, a LOT cheaper.

Posted
I can tell that you like to be right, but you still haven't answered 2000SuburbanLS's original question? Does he have to? No. Do I have to? No!

In your opinion but you seem to like slow trucks and 4 speed autos with only 3 speeds usable and shorter tranny life. Maybe he does not? (most people do not either)

Posted

chill out snoman. not everyone knows everything, including you. it seems like every time I see your posts you're arguing with someone. go plow a road and have a freaking beer.

 

:thumbs:

Posted
chill out snoman. not everyone knows everything, including you. it seems like every time I see your posts you're arguing with someone. go plow a road and have a freaking beer.

 

:thumbs:

I am chilled it is just I hate to see the blind leading the blind because any one who says a 3.73 with a small block and 34's is a great tow vechical has very low expectations indeed. It is a real counterdiction to have a big beefing looking truck with big tires for that "macho" look and have it down graded to a slower 3 speed that can get bested by a 4cyl toyota and v6 pickup because the owner wants to believe that tire size has no effect on vechical performance or gearing requirement and the life of the drive components and try to impose that belief on the unknowing.

Posted
chill out snoman.  not everyone knows everything, including you.  it seems like every time I see your posts you're arguing with someone.  go plow a road and have a freaking beer.

 

:thumbs:

I am chilled it is just I hate to see the blind leading the blind because any one who says a 3.73 with a small block and 34's is a great tow vechical has very low expectations indeed. It is a real counterdiction to have a big beefing looking truck with big tires for that "macho" look and have it down graded to a slower 3 speed that can get bested by a 4cyl toyota and v6 pickup because the owner wants to believe that tire size has no effect on vechical performance or gearing requirement and the life of the drive components and try to impose that belief on the unknowing.

you heard him, you guys are blind.....BOTH of you!!! :cheers::mad:

 

man he never said it was a great tow vehicle. he said "no problem." And you're being a tool and acting like he insulted your family, "Don't BS me, I'm argumentative."

 

So to answer this poor guys question:

 

No you don't HAVE to re-gear. You'll lose power if you don't though, and it will cause more strain on the transmission. How much? Let the pissing contest begin!

 

But no you don't have to. People DON'T do it all the time. Your truck is still perfectly driveable. But if you don't you'll speed up the process of transmission problems.

 

I just recently had to have my transmission rebuilt (I'm still paying it off even). If you feel like doing something fun this summer................do something else.

So anyway, I'm all for doing anything and everything that helps out the tranny. I would suggest re-gearing. Can't really go wrong can you? Puts a little dent in the wallet, but at least you'll have plenty of PWR and don't have to worry about the tranny as much.

Posted
chill out snoman.  not everyone knows everything, including you.  it seems like every time I see your posts you're arguing with someone.  go plow a road and have a freaking beer.

 

:thumbs:

I am chilled it is just I hate to see the blind leading the blind because any one who says a 3.73 with a small block and 34's is a great tow vechical has very low expectations indeed. It is a real counterdiction to have a big beefing looking truck with big tires for that "macho" look and have it down graded to a slower 3 speed that can get bested by a 4cyl toyota and v6 pickup because the owner wants to believe that tire size has no effect on vechical performance or gearing requirement and the life of the drive components and try to impose that belief on the unknowing.

you heard him, you guys are blind.....BOTH of you!!! :cheers::mad:

 

man he never said it was a great tow vehicle. he said "no problem." And you're being a tool and acting like he insulted your family, "Don't BS me, I'm argumentative."

 

So to answer this poor guys question:

 

No you don't HAVE to re-gear. You'll lose power if you don't though, and it will cause more strain on the transmission. How much? Let the pissing contest begin!

 

But no you don't have to. People DON'T do it all the time. Your truck is still perfectly driveable. But if you don't you'll speed up the process of transmission problems.

 

I just recently had to have my transmission rebuilt (I'm still paying it off even). If you feel like doing something fun this summer................do something else.

So anyway, I'm all for doing anything and everything that helps out the tranny. I would suggest re-gearing. Can't really go wrong can you? Puts a little dent in the wallet, but at least you'll have plenty of PWR and don't have to worry about the tranny as much.

Just stay on flat ground, do not use OD, do not pull a trailer and travel behind semi's to cut wind loading to try to say a little money on fuel to save up for when the tranny fails.

Posted

Look guys,seriously.We're all adults here and we're also here because we like trucks,most of us primarily GM but all owners are welcome.What is not welcome are childish spats over technical info because,and d**n I feel like a freaking broken record here,info is goos but BS spats take away from discussions.

 

Now,it's known that snoman and I did not see eye to eye on a thread a few weeks ago but I believe we are both mature enough to see the other's opinion.These kinds of debates are almost endless but good discussion backed up with numbers along with real life personal experience is what people who are asking the questions are looking for,not name calling or baseless accusations.

 

Now,on this vehicle in particular,IMO,a minimum of 4.10 gears would be beneficial.I realize that the majority of 2wd 2000 Subs came with 3.42 and I believe that there was an option for 3.73's.Now,4.56's might be somewhat lower than you want but if you do moderate or higher towing you would benefit from those gears.If you tow sporadically and never more than a moderate load,4.10's would be ideal for you.

 

That being said,you absolutely do not have to regear but you are taking more of a risk in burning the tranny.It's up to you really but if you did have 3.42's stock,you might do better to upgrade your gearing just a little bit to compliment for everything else involved.

Posted

Sorry if its off subject...but how hard is it exactly to replace 3.73 gears with 4.88s in my silverado? Is it just a matter of removing the old ones and putting in the new ones or what??? thanks for any help! :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,164 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...