Jump to content

Catalytic removing or gutting


Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone removed or "mod'ed" the catalytic converters on their trucks?

 

After looking at my exhaust I see that it may be posible.

 

The questions that poped up is what will the computer do? Since there is a O2 sensor before and after.

 

I understand the enviorment and legal concerns....

 

If anyone tried this, did torque, power, or MPG change?

Posted

It'll probably be opening the back end up too much and you'll lose low end performance.I'd also imagine that it would cause the post cat O2 sensor to throw some codes.

 

I don't see where it would be overly beneficial to gut it considering the above facts plus keep in mind that it is illegal.If you want to try and gain performance,try a hi flow cat though I doubt you'd notice much of a gain from that either.

Posted
I'd also imagine that it would cause the post cat O2 sensor to throw some codes.

Yes,It will more than likely set some DTC's because the O2 sensors need to see a certain amount of backpressure and if you "gut" the converter it will definetly change the backpressure,we've seen it here at the dealership a couple of times and believe me you don't want to have to buy a new converter,lotsa' $$$$$!

Posted

Hi, don't remove your cat or gut it. Yes besides the fact of tampering is a federal law, you will maybe only see 1 or 2 hp difference. The new 3-way catalyst design is very efficent in flowing exhaust gases and cleaning up "dirty" engines that it will be more trouble than its worth. The only benifit I could see is having a badass sounding truck :thumbs:

 

O2 sensors do not read back pressure in the exhaust. Yes it will change the amount of backpressure by taking out the cat but thats another thing. The way the O2 sensor works is that power is sent to the sensor and once they are heated up the amount oxygen that flows by it will change the resistance in the head of it. This information is sent back to the PCM via a AC signal where the computer can then make changes to the A/F ratio. Either the more or less voltage seen by the PCM will deturmine pulse width of the injectors to achieve that desired 14.7:1 A/F ratio.

Posted

I removed the kats from my obs 3500 454/4L80E, without throwing any DTCs, however, it should be noted that my truck has NO o2 sensors after the cats, only the 1 on each manifold.

 

You will loose a little off of the low end, unless you are towing heavy loads, you won't notice the difference. I'm doing some head work and a moderate cam, so for me, backpressure is less of a consideration, than If you intend the keep the internals stock.

 

Hope this helps.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...