Jump to content

steering rack, idler pitman arms, tie rods???


Recommended Posts

Posted

I took my truck in for an alignment today after putting the h2 wheels and tires on green keys, and rancho shocks and something is messed up.

 

They said you could move the tire an inch or so without the other one moving. They said they could not get it aligned completely. The Toe In/Out couldnt be done completely. They said with so much play in the steering they couldnt get it done. Anyone else had a problem with something like this or have any idea what it might be?

 

I called 2 dealerships about the warranty being voided for having the H2 wheels and both said it wouldnt be an issue and that I wouldnt need a letter saying it wouldnt void it or anything. Should I just take it in like it is or change out all the tires back to stock so there are no questions?

 

Thanks for the help.

Posted

If it were me and I still had the stock tires/wheels..... I would put them back on and take it to the dealer so that there is no chance of argument.

 

DEWFPO

Posted

First I would suggest finding a competent alignment shop. One that could find what the problem was. Sounds like an idler arm to me, but they should've been able to tell you cause thier hands were on it.

Posted
First I would suggest finding a competent alignment shop.  One that could find what the problem was. Sounds like an idler arm to me, but they should've been able to tell you cause thier hands were on it.

 

 

 

 

 

The place I took it was good. They said all the parts looked fine. My truck only has 10k miles on it. Havent had it offroad at all either. They said they couldnt see anything worn out or broken from what they saw but didnt want to mess with it since it is all under warranty. When I drive it the steering wheel is off center when Im driving straight.

Posted
First I would suggest finding a competent alignment shop.  One that could find what the problem was. Sounds like an idler arm to me, but they should've been able to tell you cause thier hands were on it.

 

 

 

 

 

The place I took it was good. They said all the parts looked fine. My truck only has 10k miles on it. Havent had it offroad at all either. They said they couldnt see anything worn out or broken from what they saw but didnt want to mess with it since it is all under warranty. When I drive it the steering wheel is off center when Im driving straight.

 

 

 

 

If your H2 wheels have a different offset than the stock wheels, any alignment will need to be done with the H2 wheels in place. The forces on the front suspension will be higher if the track of the H2 wheels is wider. So your front suspension will compress slightly with the H2 wheels, relative to how the suspension would be with the stock wheels. And since the A-arms are unequal length, the camber changes as the suspension compresses.

Posted

Sounds exactly like my '92 when I first bought it.

 

I went through 3 sets of idler arm/pittman arm combos before I solved it by ponying up the extra cabbage for heavy-duty Moog parts. That was about 8 years ago, and they're still holding up.

 

But if you've got a warranty? Let them figure it out. :chevy:

Posted

Talked to another dealer today who I have used for service in the past. They called GM and said they only support 1 size tire the 245 on the 2500HD. Never said it wil void warranty or not. He suggested not to do it though bc it may cause some problems. Its said he is charge of the service dept bc he really didnt know what he was talking about. Im kind of stuck now bc if I take the H2 wheels n tires off and they fix the idler arm or whatever is broken then I have to pay for another alignment after they return it all to stock. Its BS that an engine transmission and everything else is interchangeable but the wheels and tires are not. guess Im going to try one more dealership and see what they say. If its still a no looks like Ill be taking wheels off by hand and going from there. Im pretty pissed right now and GM wonders why they have problems with customer satisfaction.

Posted

In their defense (I can't believe I'm defending them :banghead: ), adding oversized tires GREATLY affects drivetrain components. They sometimes will have to work outside of their design parameters to accellerate, and to keep the truck moving. Not to mention the added unsprung mass the larger wheels/tires add to the equations.

 

Adding wheels that aren't original equipment can affect suspension geometry adversely as well, if the offset is different from factory.

 

These things add up to unreliability in the long run, as parts are working harder to achieve the same results as stock sized tires. If they're looking for an excuse to deny a several thousand dollar claim, oversized tires are an easy target, as they affect such a wide range of components.

 

 

 

 

Yeah....I like my oversized tires and rims too. :rolleyes:

Posted

I would be more understanding if the tires werent coming off a GM vehicle with the same engine, tranny etc. Sadly the H2 wheels and tires really dont weigh that much more than the Steel/chrome wheels that come on our trucks. I couldnt believe how little the diff was in weight when I had to pick them up. My truck is actually working a lot less on my drive to work everyday. Running about 2000-2500 rpms when before my tires it was more like 3200. I think I would be even less pissed if the tires that came on the truck stock were atleast half decent an didnt look like doughnuts. Atleast Dodge puts decent tires on their trucks, hell a ford f150 has better wheels and tires than our trucks. If a H2 can handle so can my truck.

 

In their defense (I can't believe I'm defending them :banghead: ), adding oversized tires GREATLY affects drivetrain components. They sometimes will have to work outside of their design parameters to accellerate, and to keep the truck moving. Not to mention the added unsprung mass the larger wheels/tires add to the equations.

 

Adding wheels that aren't original equipment can affect suspension geometry adversely as well, if the offset is different from factory.

 

These things add up to unreliability in the long run, as parts are working harder to achieve the same results as stock sized tires. If they're looking for an excuse to deny a several thousand dollar claim, oversized tires are an easy target, as they affect such a wide range of components.

 

 

 

 

Yeah....I like my oversized tires and rims too. :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Posted

I think their argument was not as much the H2 wheel, as much as it was the the oversized tire. I bet they wouldn't argue about it with a 245/75R16 mounted on the H2 rim.

 

If you want to try and narrow down the problem yourself, here are some things to look for.....

 

1. jack up one wheel at a time, and with the wheel still on the truck. Carefull pull at the top and bottom of of the tire. If there is play here, the problem will likely be either a wheel bearing, upper ball joint, lower ball joing, a bad upper control arm bushing/loose upper control arm adjustment cam. (upper control arm bushing is not likely to be bad with only 10k.) You will be able to tell what the problem is by where the play is...

 

2. with the truck on the ground, have a friend start the truck and move the wheel back and forth just enough to move both tires a little.

 

Look at the pitman arm, the idler arm, the drag link, and the tie rod ends. Specifically, look for any up/down play, you can sometimes feel it too.

 

If the play is at one of the wheels, you have a bad ball joint, and will have to replace the outer tie rod end.

 

If the play is at the ball joint just outside of the idler/pitman arm

 

If the play is in the middle, you will likely have a bad idler arm, or possibly pitman arm, though I would suspect the idler arm first. Hope that helps...

Posted
I would be more understanding if the tires werent coming off a GM vehicle with the same engine, tranny etc.  Sadly the H2 wheels and tires really dont weigh that much more than the Steel/chrome wheels that come on our trucks.  I couldnt believe how little the diff was in weight when I had to pick them up.  My truck is actually working a lot less on my drive to work everyday.  Running about 2000-2500 rpms when before my tires it was more like 3200.  I think I would be even less pissed if the tires that came on the truck stock were atleast half decent an didnt look like doughnuts.  Atleast Dodge puts decent tires on their trucks, hell a ford f150 has better wheels and tires than our trucks.  If a H2 can handle so can my truck. 

 

 

 

 

Sure an H2 can handle it...Sure the tires and wheels came off another GM vehicle with the same engine/tranny combo.

 

Problem is, your truck isn't set up for them. It's set up for the donuts. That's why you're only running 2000-2500 rpms when you were running 3200...Which is where it should be running for your particular setup. If you threw a decent sized trailer on there, you would be lugging like a big dog, as you've gotten rid of a lot of low end torque. You're changing the final drive ratio by adding taller tires. It screws with everything from your engine to your rear diff.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...