Jump to content

Spray In Bedliner

drumset5994

Recommended Posts

6Burgh Enthusiast

6Burgh

Posted
Posted

I paid $500 for line-x over the rail in a standard bed. Rhino was closer to $600. I wish I live closer to where some of you paid $300 -$400. LOL

  • 4 weeks later...
trever1t Enthusiast

trever1t

Posted
Posted

I was quoted $450 for under the rails from Line-x. I've seen their work and it looks like a solid plastic bedliner! Good stuff.

gmcjoe Senior Enthusiast

gmcjoe

Posted
Posted

Around here retail is about $425 for an under rail Rhino or Line-X

 

One thing, I finally had a Rhino sprayed into my GMC this past summer. I found out these aren't as durable as they say. There is some fine print...

 

About a month after I had it installed, I bought a skid of patio stones from Home Depot. The guy used the forklift to put it in the bed. Doing so caused a nice fine rip in my liner.

 

I took it back and they said 'well, you can't have them do that' and he filled it in and you can't even tell now.

 

Now I have to have a piece of plywood down before having anything like that done. Kind of a hassle if you ask me.

  • 4 weeks later...
sleepur606 Enthusiast

sleepur606

Posted
Posted
Around here retail is about $425 for an under rail Rhino or Line-X

 

One thing, I finally had a Rhino sprayed into my GMC this past summer.  I found out these aren't as durable as they say. There is some fine print...

 

About a month after I had it  installed, I bought a skid of patio stones from Home Depot. The guy used the forklift to put it in the bed.  Doing so caused a nice fine rip in my liner. 

 

I took it back and they said 'well, you can't have them do that'  and he filled it in and you can't even tell now.

 

Now I have to have a piece of plywood down before having anything like that done. Kind of a hassle if you ask me.

 

 

 

 

I had a Line-X liner sprayed in my truck almost a year ago and it has held up really well. I paid something like $550 in Southern California for under the rail/standard box, but I got the special UV resistant coating which added $100 to the total price. The place I did it was really nice and they even pounded out some of the dents I had in my bed. I haven't really seen anything comparable in my area, but spray in is definitely what you need if you're looking for protection for your bed.

  • 2 weeks later...
max71z Enthusiast

max71z

Posted
Posted
I've got a 99 Silvy Shortbed...

 

Anybody know the cost (approx) it would be to put in a spray-in bedliner professionally?

 

 

 

 

i used line-x it was $475 and i love it !

 

o-ya , that was over the rails .

  • 1 month later...
-[Rupes]- Enthusiast

-[Rupes]-

Posted
Posted

Go Line-X, Definatly some good stuff!, I work at the Line-X dealer in Ottawa, Ontario up here in Canada! I got my truck done and there are NO regrets! over the rail is around $550 CDN for a shortbox.

  • 2 months later...
GMCefinRocks Enthusiast

GMCefinRocks

Posted
Posted

It cost me $484 to have Line-X sprayed on my truck. I think Line-X feels softer and not as rough as Rhino. If, however, you like the way sand paper feels, then go and buy Rhino. :rant:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...