Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If anyone has the means, I would greatly appreciate it as I now have two useless block heaters (05 burb and 06 71hoe) and its frickin cold out here :confused:

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Didn't have a chance to call GM yesterday and won't be able to now until Monday.

 

Arctic you said in your earlier post something about how someone told you GM put the thermostat on there because they don't want the block heater maintaining a constant 180 F for fear of possibly damaging something internally? Did he say what?

I can't figure it out,It's baffling me :confused: ......I mean the engine runs a helluva lot hotter than that going down the road! Why would it hurt to keep the block warm when its 20 to 30 degrees F.

 

GM-Tech,Do you have any thoughts on that?

Posted
GM-Tech,Do you have any thoughts on that?

 

I agree that the possibly damage theory doesn't make sense. Like you said, it runs hotter than that under normal conditions.

 

I'm sure there's some reason for it. Finding the guy that knows the answer might be difficult.

Posted
Didn't have a chance to call GM yesterday and won't be able to now until Monday.

 

Arctic you said in your earlier post something about how someone told you GM put the thermostat on there because they don't want the block heater maintaining a constant 180 F for fear of possibly damaging something internally? Did he say what?

I can't figure it out,It's baffling me :confused: ......I mean the engine runs a helluva lot hotter than that going down the road! Why would it hurt to keep the block warm when its 20 to 30 degrees F.

 

GM-Tech,Do you have any thoughts on that?

 

 

 

 

That was what I was told, and I asked the same question...in response, I got the same deer in the headlights look that the other service tech gave me when I mentioned that there is now a thermostat on the plug :cry:

 

I too agree that it makes no sense...the trick is to find what if anything has changed in the engine since 2002 because i had a working block heater in my 02 burb...no problems. OR, find someone who has either an 05 or 06 with the thermostat-less plug factory installed block heater...as the manual says, something along the lines of "some heaters may be equipped with a thermostat..."

If a 5.3 does not have the thermostat from the factory, its probably safe to assume that the engines are the same and therefore safe to lop off the thermostat and operate like it was supposed to be when its cold...not frigid.

 

OR check a parts manual and if when looking up the p/n for the block heater for either an 05 or 06 suburbanhoe, the manual does not designate the specific model with the thermostat, and there is no special footnote or other indication that the "old," usable model without the thermostat would otherwise damage the 05 or 06 engine, and/or indicates that the thermostat-less model is appropriate, then that too would be proof enough for me...off it comes

 

Just some more thoughts...I have no idea

Posted

I too went to the dealership a couple days ago asking why they put the weird plug on to keep it from working until below 0. There were 3 mechanics that happened to be behind the counter and all of them looked at me like I was stupid, none of them knew what I was talking about.

 

One guy finally said it was because "something" could burn up if it got too hot, but he couldn't tell me what or why "0" was such a magic number.

 

The other response as I was walking out the door was my truck would start above 0 and didn't need the block heater. :confused:

Posted

Hey...thanks for the information...someone out there in this forum knows or has the means to find out why this is...we will eventually find out (just not from my dealers or apparently in the northern rockies either)

 

:confused:

Posted

Ok, I just couldn't wait any more. I bought one. The one I got doesn't have any bulge on the plug end. Looks like a standard three prong plug. I won't know if there is a stat until I get it installed, but I can hope.

Posted (edited)
Ok, I just couldn't wait any more.  I bought one.  The one I got doesn't have any bulge on the plug end.  Looks like a standard three prong plug.  I won't know if there is a stat until I get it installed, but I can hope.

 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

 

 

Is there a P/N on the cord without the thermostat. It 3F right now and it's pissing me of that the block heater won't come on.

 

DEWFPO

Edited by dewfpo
Posted

I don't see a part number, but here is the end of the cord for reference.

 

plug1.jpg

 

plug2.jpg

 

plug3.jpg

 

I don't see the buldge that everyone is talking about.

Posted

Allright guys heres the latest I came up with,This maybe a little confusing and long so bare with me :D

 

I checked the service manual and heres the first thing it says about the heater not working:

 

"Important,The power cord will read open if the ambient temperature is above -1 degree F (-18 C)"

 

That would confirm what we thought all along,That it won't work above 0 F.

 

Then I called GM-Partech and explained to the agent what we are dealing with and ask him if he could confirm a "thermostat" in the plug or when it should and shouldn't work,Well he told me no thermostat exists and it should work as soon as you plug it in and continue working for as long as its plugged in. Great I thought,Now I'm more confused :cheers::wtf:

 

So I did some tests over the last few days here since its been in the single digits but above 0 degrees.

 

The first night (about 8 degrees F) I didn't plug my truck in and it had frost all up and down the windshield the next morning and when I started it up it took almost 15 minutes to get heat.

The next night (same temp.,about 8 F) I did plug my truck in and the next morning the windshield had no frost on the lower half and when I started the truck it only took a couple of minutes to get luke-warm heat and about five minutes to get almost full heat.

I know I said in an earlier post that it wasn't working before but to be honest I never really checked it that good, (Because I don't drive my truck everyday,heck it hasn't moved in a few weeks!)

What I was mainly basing it off of was the fact that in all my other trucks I could actually hear the heater working,Kinda like a slight "humm" is what I always heard on my other trucks when the heater was plugged in.

So now I'm really confused,I'm not hearing any kinda "humm" to verify it was working but I can't see how it wasn't working the night I had it plugged in since I had heat pretty quick and no frost on the lower part of the windshield.

 

The only other thing I think I'm going to do is unplug the cord from the heater and test it,If that can be done.

 

What do you guys think?

Posted

I wouldn't rely on what one guy at Partech says anymore than I'd rely on what one of the guys at TAC says. I can talk to 3 different guys at TAC and get three different answers. It's really frustrating at times. Some of them are pretty sharp, others know little to nothing.

Posted
I wouldn't rely on what one guy at Partech says anymore than I'd rely on what one of the guys at TAC says.    I can talk to 3 different guys at TAC and get three different answers.  It's really frustrating at times.  Some of them are pretty sharp, others know little to nothing.

 

 

 

 

 

Yep,I know exactly what you mean.

I might even call back just to see what another guy says.

Sometimes though I think I know more than they do,(No...sometimes I know I know more than they do :cheers: )

You probably feel the same way,I know our techs here do.

Posted

It 17F degrees and I just plugged it in (thru a digital power meter) and it is reading 00 watts so it is not allowing power thru the cable at +17F. I have taken pictures of the plug for those who aren't familiar with it but don't know how to post them.

 

DEWFPO

Posted

A couple of things...Beasley is in the ? range with a 2003...that p/n may not necessitate the thermostat-plugged heater...like i said before...95, 99 and 02 did not have the thermostat, but the 05 and 06 do...i don't know when the thermostat began to be installed...

 

As far as the picture...different plug, both of mine are black with a circular "tumor" (a bit larger than a hearing aid battery) behind the plug.

 

Theres no question about the existence of the thermostat...if someone's heater is working intermittently, there is something wrong with that heater or the testing procedure...

 

As far as the Partech guy...first have him refer to the owners manual that states there is a thermostat which will not allow the heater to operate above 0 F and then ask him about it...perhaps he won't deny its existence

 

again, how can there not be someone at GM with the answer as to why this is...And from the posts, in addition to my own experiences, why when you as several people, who are supposed to be professionals in this business, do you get several different answers to the same question?

 

Just a thought from another forum...the combination of metal (block heater) and aluminum (block) causes corrosion when electicity is introduced via the heater...therefore, GM lowered the operable temperature thus greatly reducing the use of the heater and as a result, greatly reduced the potential problems from the corrosion issue...

 

sounds crazy, but its alot better than the stupid looks i get when i ask someone at the dealer about the thermostat :cheers::wtf::D

Posted

Another thought as I sit here lamenting the useless heaters in my trucks...

 

with GM cutting back on stuff to save money (wire gauges, engine comp light, glove box light...) perhaps they reduced the gauge of the wire for the heater however due to the significant draw, there was a problem with melting wires...instead of fixing this, they put the thermostat on to avoid the use above 0F, allowing the cold <0 temps to cool the wiring...

 

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...