Jump to content

2500HD GVW


Recommended Posts

Posted

My friend just pulled in with his brand new 2002 Dodge laramie SLT Plus 3/4 ton diesel excab 8' bed with the 6 speed and I opened the drivers door and saw it was 8800 GVW.  My HD is 9200!!!, and his truck is 10 inches longer than mine, and the diesel has to take away some because of it's weight!!!

I was really surprised to see that my truck had a heavier GVW than his...

His truck is sweet though...  Autumn wood over silver and graphite leather...  I bet it is a pulling SOB with the 6-speed.   He pulled my trailer one time for me with his '96 5-speed Cummins and I was very impressed.  But those Cummins are very noisy!!!

Posted

I love that Cummins motor, but just not the truck around it.  

Those Dodge's aren't that great for pulling large gooseneck trailers either, they have problems with the frame cracking right behind the cab.  I have a friend who is a real Mopar buff and yesterday he admitted to me that he was beat.  He and his dad went to price a new aluminum stock trailer.  They asked what  a 32' would cost, but when the dealer found out they planned to get a Dodge to pull it he wouldn't price anything longer than a 26'.  

I sure like that Cummins motor though.  Get an Allison behind that thing and you have one sweet drivetrain.

Posted

Yep, the Dodge 2500 is comparable in GVWR to the 2500 Silverado.  The Dodge 2500 is available with a much stouter drivetrain then the 2500 Silverado though.  Its comparable to your 2500HD in this area.

And you are correct, the HO Cummins combined with a 6-speed is a very stout setup for pulling.  They must have done some work on sound deadening in the newer trucks, because the one I drove wasn't very loud inside.  Sure wouldn't want to slap an auto behind a diesel if I wanted to pull with it though....

  • 7 months later...
Posted

The only problem with a Cummins powered dodge is the Dodge bolted to the Cummins motor.  With that out of the way yes the HD has a higher GVWR higher than that of dodge.  Just for future information if you overload a dodge enough the spring perches on the frame will actually rip off the frame.  You got to love that! :sigh:  :)  :D  :P  :D

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

On the truck badge the '2500' of the '2500HD' is a bit misleading.

 

2500 suggests a 3/4 ton truck. If you guys take a looky, you'll notice your 2500HD is sitting atop the dually chassis.

 

9200 has been the benchmark GVW for 1 ton SRW trucks for some years. That's what you got boys, a 1 ton SRW truck.

 

Same as the Ford SD F350 SRW except Ford upped the GVW to 9700 and they have an option to push it to 9900.

 

This summer, Dodge will introduce the 2500/3500 Heavy Duty series. For the first time a 3500 SRW will be available with a 305hp cummins HO

 

There is a truck war on....

Posted
On the truck badge the '2500' of the '2500HD' is a bit misleading.

 

2500 suggests a 3/4 ton truck. If you guys take a looky, you'll notice your 2500HD is sitting atop the dually chassis.

 

9200 has been the benchmark GVW for 1 ton SRW trucks for some years. That's what you got boys, a 1 ton SRW truck.

 

Same as the Ford SD F350 SRW except Ford upped the GVW to 9700 and they have an option to push it to 9900.

 

This summer, Dodge will introduce the 2500/3500 Heavy Duty series. For the first time a 3500 SRW will be available with a 305hp cummins HO

 

There is a truck war on....

The problem with high GVW single rear wheel trucks is the tires can't handle the load. That's one of the reasons GM decide to make the 3500 only available as a dually.

 

Think about it, 9900 lbs. GVW distributed over 12,000 lbs worth of tire capability. Evenly distributed should not be a problem but where does most of your load go? In the bed. Where is the trailer? In the back. Where is the gooseneck hitch? Over the rear wheels.

 

It's simply a numbers war. It was interesting how when GM came out with higher GVW numbers than the Ford, they (Ford) instantly revised their numbers upwards. Same truck.

 

With all that said, a 2500HD has a gooseneck trailer capacity of 15,700 lbs. with a GCVW of 22,000 in a SRW truck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,002 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...