Jump to content

4" lift


Big Boy

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thinking about a 4" Rancho lift or a 3" body lift.  Been looking around for pics of a truck with just the 4" lift.  Are there some here I'm just not seeing?

 

Is there someone out there besides Rancho that does a 4" lift.  Can't go higher cause the little woman likes to drive it too and she has to work to get in already. (she's a petite 5'3")

 

Thanks

Posted

I've got a bodylift on my truck.  If you look around the picture post forum you'll find tons of pics of it, or just go to my site for some pics http://www.chevy4x4trucks.com

 

I think trailmaster makes a 4" lift as well, but if you want to go 4" rancho is the lift to get IMO.

 

With my bodylift I can jump in and out no problem (I'm 6'4")  However my little sister who's 10 has some problems getting in since I got the lift, especially if she's trying to get in the back seat.

Posted

Saw your truck pics - Very nice!  

 

Just curious about the suspension lift.  I guess looks would be very similar although I heard that someone who put on the 4" from Rancho actually got 5.5" from it.

Posted

Yeah, you actually get close to 6" from the rancho lift at the factory T-Bar settings from what I've heard.  IMO a suspension lift is going to be more lift than you'd want and would keep the wife out of your truck (unless that's your goal :thumbs: )

Posted

body lifts are cheap, but if youve got the cash, put on the rancho 4".  it does indeed come out to about a 5.5".  and looks and rides great.  my neighbor has one on his 2000 ext cab z71.  i can take some pics of it and post them on here if you'd like to see what his looks like, he has 33s w/ 16x10 welds on it.  looks so good!

Posted

Just my opinion, but I would go with the TrailMaster 4" lift.  TrailMaster generally tends to use better materials in their applications and their springs rates are usually a little higher.  The body lift is fine so long as your not going to be doing a lot of off roading.

Posted

You can  check out my pics, I have both the body lift AND the Rancho 4".  I love the Rancho.  I HATE the body lift.  It looks good, but there are so many things that I feel limited by it, for example the amount of weight you can put in your bed.  Since the bed is no longer sitting directly on the frame, if the load is too heavy, it could bend the bed (not likely, but a possibility).  Also, if you want a grille guard, that is a grille GUARD, not just for looks, then you have to have custom brackets made to attach the guard, which means you lose a lot of the strength of the grille guard.  Also, your tow hooks have to come off, unless you want to drill 2 more holes and mount you tow hooks to those.  Then, there's the whole seeing of the frame from the side view.  I have some nerf bars that block that view, but still it bothers some people.  

 

Well, feel free to take a look at my pics, and good luck to ya.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have been told by several people that Rancho is the way to go if you want a suspension lift.  Rancho welds the main frame together for strength.  On the other hand, I have also been told that you can't reverse a Rancho lift on GM trucks.  When my p/u comes in, I plan to put a Rancho lift on it to reach the 5th wheel.  I convinced the wife that it is much better to lift the truck than lower the camper.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
    • Engines wear. It is unavoidable. So the question isn't if it will wear out but rather WHEN it will wear out. That question is about rate and RATE is a HUGE problem for almost everyone; but not in the way we may think.    Unless there is something drastically wrong with your powertrain, wear is exceedingly slow. It doesn't wear out in minutes or hours or days or months but in years or even decades. Ditto sludge and varnish. Humans are an impatient lot so to see the benefit of a truly superior product you may have to wait a very long time. Most will get bored first and trade before they reap the benefit.   Humans are not companionate creatures when it comes to those we do not know. We don't care what happens to the second or third owner as long as it doesn't happen to us or someone we know and actually like.   Sad commentary on humans but it is what it is. That thus, then, there is no advantage...to or for you if the above paragraphs adequately describe you.    BUT if you are a buy and hold type and patient enough to reap the rewards of your labors then that thing that is happening that you haven't yet seen, but will; can be abated by such products. Seals harden and leak with time and lots of it. Rings stick after thousands of miles of a slowly building plaque of varnish.    Then there is this. This didn't happen over night and this poor fellow knew when he removed the cover and not one second before.   Not "aware' isn't the same thing as "isn't happening".        The above was typical of the Ford 361 and 391 bus motors on Bulk Pennzoil Mineral Oil products on 3K mile OCI's at about 60K miles back in the 60's and 70's at the Anamosa School District when my Uncle took over their maintenance program.    This is Pepper at @ 165K on 5K OCI's using Group IV/V Full Synthetics.      HM oils will help the first but not the second.    Then again if one used..... ah, ya know.....
    • Thanks for coming back with an update. 
    • Awesome you got it sorted! That's a new potential issue I'll have to mark in my book of issues. Thanks for the feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...