Jump to content

Heavy Duty Transfer Case


Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to replace my NP203 transfer case with an AWD one. It's got to be just a one speed and able to handle the power of a heavily built up BBC with over 700 hp. Anyone know of one that will work?

Posted

I thought a 203 was AWD? For that application I'd get a Turbo 400 2wd tranny and if you need 4wd just run a jackshaft setup (weld in a new crossmember holding the front shaft up and run a chain around the rear front yoke, instant 4WD).

Posted
I thought a 203 was AWD? For that application I'd get a Turbo 400 2wd tranny and if you need 4wd just run a jackshaft setup (weld in a new crossmember holding the front shaft up and run a chain around the rear front yoke, instant 4WD).

 

 

An NP203 isn't an AWD transfer case. It acts like 2wd (worst front or worst rear) or if locked then it's a 4wd transfer case which won't work on the street.

 

What I need is a one speed transfer case with clutches like an Eaton Posi or a viscous one. Problem is that it will need to stand up to some high horsepower.

Posted

Look at gear driven transfer cases then, they will take a lot of abuse...I think in a NP it's the 205.

Posted
Look at gear driven transfer cases then, they will take a lot of abuse...I think in a NP it's the 205.

 

 

I know the NP205 is super strong. I'll check that one out. I just have to be sure I can drive with it engaged, hooking the front to the rear at all times. If it's a typical 4wheel drive transfer case, then it will bind when cornering on the street.

Posted

You should be able to convert it to part time if you run a doubler setup, where you run a second transfer case and that will prevent power from going to the front wheels while giving you a much lower gearing.

Posted

NVG 149 is from the Denali's, don't know how much power they can handle though. BW 4472, I think, was used in the Cyclones with the 4.3 turbo, again, not sure about how much power they will take but I have seen one run 10.0's on stock drivetrain.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
    • Brought my 2015 Colorado into the dealership to check my touch screen issues, had that ghost touch thing happening. They said I needed a new touch screen and they could either order me one for $500. The lady at the service deck was nice enough to tell me I could order a touch screen online for less, she did stipulate that the touch screen had to be factory OEM, you can't pair an aftermarket screen to my radio seeing it was 2015, it had to be a GM factory OEM only. I found a few on Amazon and Ebay by the numbers on the back of the old screen, DJ080PA-01A GM# 22740886, Some said "OEM" in the description and others just said "Replacement". Would a replacement be the same as a OEM as long as it had the same numbers on the back of the screen? In some of the descriptions they also show different brand names but same numbers, is that an issue?  
    • I have both but typically use the 4 legged walker (wheels on front, ski's on back).   The four wheeler is starting to be used on "longer" outdoor walks.  The 4 legged walker is particularly helpful in practicing good walking posture.  Both of my knees are at different stages of recovery and I'm trying to not develop poor habits.  I can actually manage with a cane but it's very difficult not to favor one leg over the other.  My PT recommends I continue with my 4 legged walker for a while.  Yesterday was four weeks since my last knee replacement and I'm excited about my progress to date.  It has been a hell of a rough journey so far but it is exciting to witness  systematic and continuous improvement.  I went for years watching the decline of my "mobility".  It seems that everyday now I am alerting my wife to something I can do now that I couldn't a day or two ago!  I encourage anyone facing the prospect of knee replacement to share any concerns with others who have had the surgery.  It isn't an instant fix but rather is a considerable amount of short term pain for long term gain.  Recovery time and pain levels vary for individuals post surgery but the end results are typically very positive and I've never encountered anyone regretting having had the surgery. 
    • The lifter issue can be dealt with by shorter oil changes and quality oil IMO.
    • Got heavy rain, hail and light rain yesterday. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...