Jump to content

New Member With A Question


Recommended Posts

Posted
If original to the vehicle, probably about 150 hp then. I don't know about the torque.

She is original, down to the chains that hold the tailgate in place......only 150horse........d**n!!!!!

Posted

My 71 was rated at 250 but I know that started dropping ponies like crazy in the mid 70s.

 

However, it should not matter what it currently has. You know you want to do a little hot rodding to the small block.

Posted
My 71 was rated at 250 but I know that started dropping ponies like crazy in the mid 70s.

 

However, it should not matter what it currently has. You know you want to do a little hot rodding to the small block.

 

Yeah

 

But as she sits right now she would need a full ground up restoration :(

Posted
Yeah

 

But as she sits right now she would need a full ground up restoration :D

 

That would be quite an undertaking, but.. If you're going to do that, anyway, just do some work on the motor and beef that up, too. It'd be a great project, you'd learn a lot, and it would be the way YOU want it..... AND probably a lot cheaper than buying a new one! :lol:

 

If you restore it, post pics! Lots and lots of pics!

 

My dad had a '74 Cheyenne Super with the 454 in it. I was pretty young at the time, but I still remember liking that truck and the way it sounded. It wasn't too long after that when I got bit by the horsepower bug. Man, has that has cost me some money over the years...! :)

Posted

I looked at the specs for the 74 400 was 175 hp and at 280 lbs. ft. Not as bad as the 350 @ 155 hp. , my 05 4.3 V6 is more powerful. I took out the 250 L6 in my Dad's 1978 GMC three speed manual and put in a floor shifter, and a L69 Monte Carlo SS 305(200 hp, 260 lbs. ft.) in place of it. The 250 L6 had electric chokes in 78 and put in a M4ME instead of an 4MV Easy trucks to work on. Fun to drive.

 

Also before 1972, they used gross ie. horsepower without accessories, after that net ie with accessories. So a 2005 4.3L v6 would be over a HP per cubic inch using gross ratings(310 hp!!! around there).

  • 4 months later...
Posted
I looked at the specs for the 74 400 was 175 hp and at 280 lbs. ft. Not as bad as the 350 @ 155 hp. , my 05 4.3 V6 is more powerful. I took out the 250 L6 in my Dad's 1978 GMC three speed manual and put in a floor shifter, and a L69 Monte Carlo SS 305(200 hp, 260 lbs. ft.) in place of it. The 250 L6 had electric chokes in 78 and put in a M4ME instead of an 4MV Easy trucks to work on. Fun to drive.

 

Also before 1972, they used gross ie. horsepower without accessories, after that net ie with accessories. So a 2005 4.3L v6 would be over a HP per cubic inch using gross ratings(310 hp!!! around there).

 

Cadha13 has a good point, so don't let numbers scare you....ratings are different today.

a smog equiped 400 has plenty still.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...