Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I read a long article on HID's which made me understand them a little better. My question is do you need/have to have projectors when having HID's? Are the projectors just for looks or do they serve a real purpose with these bulbs? Thanks for any tips or info you can give!

Posted

No, you do not need to have projectors for HID's. There are lots of vehicles that people have modified or vehicles that came direct from the factory with HID's in reflector style headlamp housings. That being said, putting HID's into stock halogen headlamp assemblies isn't the best idea, but it can be done (that is how most aftermarket conversions are done). The stock assemblies were designed to accept and reflect halogen light, not HID.

 

Projectors are not for looks. They provide precise light control. They work very well with HID headlamps, due to the nature of the bulb output.

Posted

So basically the HID light in a reflective housing wouldn't be as focused and probaby blind people? Reason I'm asking is I have considered tinting my headlights but thought I would need a brighter light to compensate for the tint. I'm not sold on the idea yet cause I also considered just tinting the side where the amber markers are. Just tossing around some ideas in my head.

Posted

I've had 12000K HIDS (way too purple)! and currently have 6000K HIDS in my GMT-900 and the light is aimed just as well. There is no stray light and is not blinding to other drivers. Even on foggy nights you can see the beams of light and how well it is aimed. Also i've never had any flash there brights at me and people do it to me all the time in my other truck with aftermarket halogens and headlight housings.

Posted

Yeah, it is very important to make sure they're aimed correctly. Even old dim lights can blind people if they are just slightly too high or pointed towards the side. Some folks intentionally aim them so they can see the entire road. In other words, it''s like driving with super bright high-beams all the time. Definately not good for other drivers on the road.

Posted

If your headlights are out of focus then they will blind people. The GMT-900's actually have a very precise beam pattern, so they do work fairly well with HID kits. You could also look into getting an aftermarket set of projectors and then install your HID's. That would be optimal, but not required.

 

Do NOT tint your headlights. It's illegal in most areas and just plain dumb. It will reduce the output of the headlights, no matter if you have stock or HID.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...