Jump to content

News


Guest Friz

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've read from a reliable source that RCR  WILL NOT retire the #3.

But the Number 3 will be on a year Hyanis (SP?) from WC this year. It will return next year.

If you want to know the site, then PM me.

Posted

I don't know if a team is allowed to permanently "retire" a number. Perhaps if teams were allowed to retire numbers at will, Michael Waltrip would be driving

"The #4837 NAPA Chevy Monte Carlo".

When Richard Petty's #43 was "retired" it wasput away  for one season only. I understand what D.E.'s contribution to NASCAR was,  but as a person was his life worth more than Adam Petty, Kenny Irwin, Or Neil Bonnet?

Maybe I'm completely off-base on this, y'all don't kill me.

Posted

I don't get why they allowed Kenny Irwin's No. 42 to be  Retired.

Richard Childress said on the site that I read this (Racingone.com), that was the reason he wouldn't retire #3, NASCAR doesn't traditionally retire numbers.

 

Posted

Kenny Irwin's #42 was not retired. Felix Sabattus and Chip Gannassi own it, They are simply opting not to use it at this time.

It's my understanding that once a number is purchased by a team from NASCAR, it is theirs. I'm sure that NASCAR has some constraints on the purchase and use of team numbers (or we'd end up with huge numbers like I mentioned earlier), but I'm sure in a case like this, they give car owners some leeway.

This is just my best guess on this subject, any help out there?

Posted

Friz you are definitely right about the value of a life from one person to another but they have to honor DE on the circuit somehow.

If not via # retirement then some other way.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,889
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    smandy
    Newest Member
    smandy
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 514 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
    • from another thread   Update...although the truck sometimes seems to idle weird and the transmission shift a little weird, I've driven about 7,000  miles and no issues.   However, the way GM has handled my rental reimbursement, the situation when my truck quit, and the recall in general has led me to this point...I have driven a GM vehicle for the past 46 years and unless I buy a C3 Corvette, this is the last GM vehicle I will ever own. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...