4th Quarter...17-3

NewbieZ71 · February 3, 2002

Is this actually happening?!?!?!? I liked the Patriots coming out as a team.... nice touch.

Elwood · February 3, 2002

Could this be the first ever Super Bowl to go to Overtime?

NewbieZ71 · February 3, 2002

No.

Elwood · February 3, 2002

But it should've been.

Josh · February 4, 2002

NO. it shouldn't have been

Patriots played better the whole game

Pats should have had the touchdown that was taken away from them. The rams were the ones holding!!!!!

The score should have been 26 17.

Jpshostr · February 4, 2002

NO. it shouldn't have been

Patriots played better the whole game

Pats should have had the touchdown that was taken away from them. The rams were the ones holding!!!!!

The score should have been 26 17.

It was the same case for the Rams as it was the whole year long. The only team that could beat the Rams was the Rams. Just giving up those 14 or 17 points depending on how you look at it put the dagger in their heart. Really, the only points truly earned by the Pats was the last field goal, where again the Rams beat themselves in relaxing too much.

Elwood · February 4, 2002

NO. it shouldn't have been

Patriots played better the whole game

Pats should have had the touchdown that was taken away from them. The rams were the ones holding!!!!!

The score should have been 26 17.

It was the same case for the Rams as it was the whole year long. The only team that could beat the Rams was the Rams. Just giving up those 14 or 17 points depending on how you look at it put the dagger in their heart. Really, the only points truly earned by the Pats was the last field goal, where again the Rams beat themselves in relaxing too much.

I don't know, I think it could've gone either way on that call. But personally I would've just not called it, since it looked like it could've gone both ways.

But it is about time a call went against the Pats anyway. Look at it like this, at least it didn't cost them the game, unlike some bad calls this postseason.