Jump to content

New F150 Option


sc4808

Recommended Posts

Posted

I heard through the grapevine that ford was adding a new feature (option) to the F150 due to the large snowfall amount across the country.

 

Its option code x67 which adds a Heated Tailgate (availible with or without the "man step")

 

Ford said that this is one of their "Better Ideas" and helps to keep the drivers hands warm while he is pushing the truck through the SNOW.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
:shakehead:

But still funny! :nono:

 

Don't forget the MBF option as well..

 

It's a dog of your choice to keep the ford owners company as he uses his warm hands to push his truck home

 

MBF = mans best friend

  • 1 month later...
Posted

hmmmmm, dis dis dis.....

 

I have always been a GM/Ford person. I can never remember one ford in the family just being a problem child. Nor GM..... I drove a 1996 F150 5.8l 4x4 RCSB for a term of 186k..... In which I never turned any bolts that was not involved in the oil and filter changes (engine, transmission, transfer case, differential's). I did change the serpentine belt once and the idler pulley just because it had 100k on it..... During that time NOT ONCE did it have any problem that left me stranded or not stranded. Only thing I remember about it was it could pass anything on the road except the service station you could really watch the fuel gauge go down.....

 

With that said my current 99 GMC Sierra 5.3 extcsb has 178k on it right now. No real problems to mention. Either. Thou it did have a water leak from day one. Till I found the water pump gasket was causing the leak..... Dealer never could find it...

 

But the whole man step thing..... Go for it..... WTF... What is that thing for? I am still scratching my head on this no tail gate is that far off the ground........ As I am with the hole torsion rod/shock tailgate helper..... WHO NEEDS IT....... And why.... My other half has no problem closing my tailgate..... Whats the big deal... Heck she can even take it off and set it on the ground and put it back on....

 

Jbo

Posted
But the whole man step thing..... Go for it..... WTF... What is that thing for? I am still scratching my head on this no tail gate is that far off the ground........

 

Easy...

 

Ford was stupid and made their "1/2" ton trucks WAY toooo big. That was deliberate. Then...in a successful attempt to fool the sheep out there, they develop the stupid "MAN-STEP" and act like the greatest innovator in the world.

 

It's like a doctor giving you Cancer...then claiming he is the hero because he can give you chemo.

 

f15018.jpg

Posted
But the whole man step thing..... Go for it..... WTF... What is that thing for? I am still scratching my head on this no tail gate is that far off the ground........

 

Easy...

 

Ford was stupid and made their "1/2" ton trucks WAY toooo big. That was deliberate. Then...in a successful attempt to fool the sheep out there, they develop the stupid "MAN-STEP" and act like the greatest innovator in the world.

 

It's like a doctor giving you Cancer...then claiming he is the hero because he can give you chemo.

 

f15018.jpg

 

 

I admit they have got higher and higher....... But the first one of the MAN Step I saw was on a 3/4 ton 2 or 3 years ago..... I was repainting the roof panel on that truck.... That truck was a couple years old so maybe 2004-2006... I don't remember any more what year they started the step.

 

However it was handy when I had the truck on my frame rack..... Which increases the height by 24 inches..... but that's why I have a ladder also.

 

GM has even grown the size of the GMT's..... R10 vs a GMT-400 was nearly no difference.... GMT-400 vs GMT-800 a couple inches..... GMT-800 vs GMT-900 a couple inches again... I am not complaining I actually like the fact they grew in size. I LOVE driving my land barge.

 

Jbo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,995 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...