Jump to content

Bose Sub Woofer Replacement


Recommended Posts

Posted

On Thursday: The amp is all wired up and I finally got the fuse holder all mounted up. I also got the box all cut up. I also cut out a piece of ply wood...so this is where the box is tonight. I decided this weekend that I don't like it. I am going to cut out some rings tomorrow and glass them into the box.

post-57050-1281924585_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924615_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924585_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924615_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924585_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924615_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924585_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1281924615_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I glassed in the rings yesterday afternoon. I am having problems getting the resin to set up. I left it over night and this morning it is still a little tacky. I am pretty frustrated. This is not my first time working with fiberglass. The first batch I mixed as per the instructions was way way too hot. The plastic cup ended up melting and smoking. The second batch was still too hot. No smoking but it kicked in just 2 minutes. The last batch I mixed has still not set up. I guess I put too little hardener in it...

 

 

I am going to mix up a hot batch in a few hours if it does not get set up anymore.

Posted

I got the sub in the box this morning. I found a few holes I missed with the resin. (the hot batch worked!) Once the glue sets up I'll give it a try again. The amp is making the sub move pretty well...

Posted

Not to rain on your parade here...But I think you're doing a whole lot of work for something that will ultimately disappoint a bit.

 

See...Bose modulates the signal strength in certain frequency ranges dependent upon certain factors. Like volume. Mainly because their subs can't handle high volumes without sounding like the paper pieces of crap that they are. And the amp that you're replacing doesn't control that. The head unit does. And you're not replacing that.

 

At least that's my experience with adding subs to a Bose system anyway. I added a really nice amp and two 10" Kicker Comp V/R's to the Bose system in my Trailblazer SS, and it only sounded good at a lower volume level. If I turned it up, it would turn DOWN the bass signal. And all my work was for naught and it sounded like complete ASS if I turned it up. The only way I could make it sound good at higher volumes was to play with the amp gain and range...But then it sounded horrible at normal volumes...And it's not something you adjust on the fly or while driving.

 

HOWEVER...That truck didn't have a factory Bose sub. Let's hope that it's different for you because your truck actually has a sub. Let's hope that Bose actually sends a decent signal to your amp. But I wouldn't hope that much. I've never had a good experience with adding anything to Bose (or listening to Bose products for that matter).

 

 

Or I'm just biased because I can't stand Bose :rant:

Posted
Not to rain on your parade here...But I think you're doing a whole lot of work for something that will ultimately disappoint a bit.

 

See...Bose modulates the signal strength in certain frequency ranges dependent upon certain factors. Like volume. Mainly because their subs can't handle high volumes without sounding like the paper pieces of crap that they are. And the amp that you're replacing doesn't control that. The head unit does. And you're not replacing that.

 

At least that's my experience with adding subs to a Bose system anyway. I added a really nice amp and two 10" Kicker Comp V/R's to the Bose system in my Trailblazer SS, and it only sounded good at a lower volume level. If I turned it up, it would turn DOWN the bass signal. And all my work was for naught and it sounded like complete ASS if I turned it up. The only way I could make it sound good at higher volumes was to play with the amp gain and range...But then it sounded horrible at normal volumes...And it's not something you adjust on the fly or while driving.

 

HOWEVER...That truck didn't have a factory Bose sub. Let's hope that it's different for you because your truck actually has a sub. Let's hope that Bose actually sends a decent signal to your amp. But I wouldn't hope that much. I've never had a good experience with adding anything to Bose (or listening to Bose products for that matter).

 

 

Or I'm just biased because I can't stand Bose :rant:

Obviously you know what you are talking about! I will see how this turns out and then evaluate from there. Hopefully if nothing else, all of my work will save someone else all of this trouble in the future.

 

Did you try to defeat the auto volume adjust?(with as much as you have to say on the subject you must have)

 

 

Did you cut out the bose box to add your own sub? How much volume is the bose box?

 

box internal volume: 7.405L(.261cuft)

port volume is .013cuft

add em up if you plan on not using the port

Posted
Not to rain on your parade here...But I think you're doing a whole lot of work for something that will ultimately disappoint a bit.

 

See...Bose modulates the signal strength in certain frequency ranges dependent upon certain factors. Like volume. Mainly because their subs can't handle high volumes without sounding like the paper pieces of crap that they are. And the amp that you're replacing doesn't control that. The head unit does. And you're not replacing that.

 

At least that's my experience with adding subs to a Bose system anyway. I added a really nice amp and two 10" Kicker Comp V/R's to the Bose system in my Trailblazer SS, and it only sounded good at a lower volume level. If I turned it up, it would turn DOWN the bass signal. And all my work was for naught and it sounded like complete ASS if I turned it up. The only way I could make it sound good at higher volumes was to play with the amp gain and range...But then it sounded horrible at normal volumes...And it's not something you adjust on the fly or while driving.

 

HOWEVER...That truck didn't have a factory Bose sub. Let's hope that it's different for you because your truck actually has a sub. Let's hope that Bose actually sends a decent signal to your amp. But I wouldn't hope that much. I've never had a good experience with adding anything to Bose (or listening to Bose products for that matter).

 

 

Or I'm just biased because I can't stand Bose :fume:

Obviously you know what you are talking about! I will see how this turns out and then evaluate from there. Hopefully if nothing else, all of my work will save someone else all of this trouble in the future.

 

Did you try to defeat the auto volume adjust?(with as much as you have to say on the subject you must have)

 

 

Did you cut out the bose box to add your own sub? How much volume is the bose box?

 

box internal volume: 7.405L(.261cuft)

port volume is .013cuft

add em up if you plan on not using the port

 

 

The volume-according-to-speed thing? Yeah. That was turned off. It worked okay with the factory setup, but once you throw an amp in the mix, it makes a mess of stuff!

 

I hope that the Bose system in your truck is different and this works very well for you. Mainly because I'm not far from buying a new truck, and ALL the trucks I'm looking at have Bose in 'em. :rant: So I have a vested interest in your results :lol:

Posted
The volume-according-to-speed thing? Yeah. That was turned off. It worked okay with the factory setup, but once you throw an amp in the mix, it makes a mess of stuff!

 

I hope that the Bose system in your truck is different and this works very well for you. Mainly because I'm not far from buying a new truck, and ALL the trucks I'm looking at have Bose in 'em. :rant: So I have a vested interest in your results :fume:

 

I just walked outside and tried it without the engine on. It actually sounded pretty good. I turned the volume up and the radio didn't seem to turn the sub volume down. Remember take it for what it is worth, I just hooked it up and had it sitting on the floor.

 

Can you tell me how the stock head unit seemed to modulate the bass? Did it do it immediately or did it take a while to adjust?

 

 

When it finally stops raining I'll take the other one out and put the new one in. The box still has a pin hole leak in it. Fiberglass was not the way to go.

Posted

It was instant.

 

But it was a full-on Nav unit...I seem to recall there being a separate control box as well.

 

I gave up after that though. I didn't want to replace the whole shebang...ANd stereo stuff is heavy anyway, so out it came :rant:

 

I'm sure that each setup they produce is different too. Which gives me hope for your success!

Posted
It was instant.

 

But it was a full-on Nav unit...I seem to recall there being a separate control box as well.

 

I gave up after that though. I didn't want to replace the whole shebang...ANd stereo stuff is heavy anyway, so out it came :rant:

 

I'm sure that each setup they produce is different too. Which gives me hope for your success!

 

I'm going to button everything back up after I find all of the pinhole leaks. After a few days I'll report back. Crossing my fingers. :fume:

 

Here is some more box building pictures.

post-57050-1282423434_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423446_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423460_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423469_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423481_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423434_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423446_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423460_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423469_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423481_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423434_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423446_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423460_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423469_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423481_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423434_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423446_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423460_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423469_thumb.jpg

post-57050-1282423481_thumb.jpg

Posted

You will need something like a clean sweep or rockford fosgate 3sixty to clean up the signal coming from the stock stereo. The stock stereo has it own eq. One of these signal processers will flaten that eq of the stock radio which will allow the amp to do its on thing. It will act more like an aftermarket radio once you add one of the processers.

Posted
You will need something like a clean sweep or rockford fosgate 3sixty to clean up the signal coming from the stock stereo. The stock stereo has it own eq. One of these signal processers will flaten that eq of the stock radio which will allow the amp to do its on thing. It will act more like an aftermarket radio once you add one of the processers.

 

THAT'S what it was called! I was trying to think of it the other day. JL Audio Cleansweep. They were like $400-$500 at the time though...So I gave up.

 

Ahsmo...You do good work. I can't work with glass to save my life. :rant:

Posted
You will need something like a clean sweep or rockford fosgate 3sixty to clean up the signal coming from the stock stereo. The stock stereo has it own eq. One of these signal processers will flaten that eq of the stock radio which will allow the amp to do its on thing. It will act more like an aftermarket radio once you add one of the processers.

 

THAT'S what it was called! I was trying to think of it the other day. JL Audio Cleansweep. They were like $400-$500 at the time though...So I gave up.

 

Ahsmo...You do good work. I can't work with glass to save my life. :rant:

 

Audiocontrol also make them and I think they are more reasonable.

Posted

I've read that the factory HU provides a line level output to the Bose amp. The bose amp then does the rest. So, you should be able to splice into the line level output from the factory HU (before the bose amp) and run that to your aftermarket amp for a sub.

 

Is this not true?

 

If so, I'm planning on just doing the following to replace the bose sub:

- Not really replace it, just turn it off, and run the line level input to a new amp on the back wall

- Running an underseat box with two JL 8W7s

 

Seems like the easiest solution to me. Don't have to gut the bose, etc.

 

Thoughts on this approach?

Thanks for the great thread OP, you caused me to register on the forums just to reply.

Posted
I've read that the factory HU provides a line level output to the Bose amp. The bose amp then does the rest. So, you should be able to splice into the line level output from the factory HU (before the bose amp) and run that to your aftermarket amp for a sub.

 

Is this not true?

 

If so, I'm planning on just doing the following to replace the bose sub:

- Not really replace it, just turn it off, and run the line level input to a new amp on the back wall

- Running an underseat box with two JL 8W7s

 

Seems like the easiest solution to me. Don't have to gut the bose, etc.

 

Thoughts on this approach?

Thanks for the great thread OP, you caused me to register on the forums just to reply.

 

That may or may not be true. I looked, read, and tried to figure out what the deal was with the output from the bose head unit. The only way to figure it out was to ask someone which you are obviously trying to do...and I am not helping or to just try it. The only bad thing about trying it is you have to cut your wiring harness up. I found that thing to be a total piece of garbage. I somehow bent the ground pen just a fraction of an inch and the factory amp kept cutting out every time I looked at the plugs wrong. I bent the ground pin back a fraction of an inch and now it works just fine. So If you are going a little more high end than me(which doesn't take much), I would get a high level converter and install it right at the factory amp and run RCAs back to the amp on the back wall.

 

Have you found a box for those subs or are you going to build one? There are tons of pre-fab boxes but none that I have seen will fit a 8w7.

 

If you got 2 8w7s in there I am sure it would be loud and sound good. On the other hand, the my little RE 8 is making stuff in my truck vibrate so you might get trapped in a circle trying to stop all of the rattles.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,847
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    FiLo
    Newest Member
    FiLo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • sorry to bump an old thread, im a bit clueless with this stuff, would these fit a 2019+ Silverado? https://wiperpro.com.au/products/chevrolet-silverado-wiper-blades mainly wondering if the beam shape stays planted at highway speed, thats what seems to let the factory ones down imo
    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...