Jump to content

Xm->sirius Conversion.

gadgetguy1288

Recommended Posts

gadgetguy1288 Enthusiast

gadgetguy1288

Posted
Posted

I tried searching but nothing recent came up so I thought Id ask. I want to switch to Sirius in my 2010 ext cab Silvy, and before anyone asks why, here ya go..

 

I have a sirius plug-in unit that I purchased about 2 years ago while stationed in Juneau, AK(Radio there sux) and when i activated it I bought the lifetime subscription for the ability to transfer it to a new vehicle. Well, after several long and quite heated conversations with supervisors on both sides of the company, no-one can give me a solid, no BS reason why they cant just carry over my subscription. And where Im at Xm reception is horrible, but while I had the Sirius in my other car, it was awesome. And I have no problem putting the other antennae on my truck, but I refuse to just put the external unit in cuz it just looks tacky IMO.

 

So, is there anyway to convert the XM receiver to a Sirius receiver, and still maintain the steeringwheel controls?

 

tylerjenkins92@aol.com Senior Enthusiast

[email protected]

Posted
Posted

This conversion would be virtually pointless nowadays since they have merged and have the exact same channels, disregard a small number of proprietary channels for each. But with xm and the best of sirius, you get those to.

gadgetguy1288 Enthusiast

gadgetguy1288

Posted
  • Author
Posted
This conversion would be virtually pointless nowadays since they have merged and have the exact same channels, disregard a small number of proprietary channels for each. But with xm and the best of sirius, you get those to.

 

This isnt really the case, they may have the same channels but the two are still run differently and have different transmission methods. I have a lifetime subscription to Sirius that I cannot transfer to XM. And although they are both "Satellite radio", IIRC XM also uses ground towers to transmit signal in addition to satellite in poor reception areas and my area is apparently one of those because XM has dead spots every half a mile around here, while Sirius still works perfectly.

ZmanZ71 Enthusiast

ZmanZ71

Posted
Posted

id like to know this as well. I've had sirius in all my dodge trucks and now my chevy has xm. I thought they were the same now but I was wrong. The reception is not nearly as good and the different channel line up has thrown me for a loop. I'd love to go back to sirius and still have all the factory functions and controls as well as the factory look without the ugly box hanging from the windshield. When my 3 month trial is up and they call me to renew i'm going to tell them it sucks haha.

00_Extended Enthusiast

00_Extended

Posted
Posted
This conversion would be virtually pointless nowadays since they have merged and have the exact same channels, disregard a small number of proprietary channels for each. But with xm and the best of sirius, you get those to.

 

This isnt really the case, they may have the same channels but the two are still run differently and have different transmission methods. I have a lifetime subscription to Sirius that I cannot transfer to XM. And although they are both "Satellite radio", IIRC XM also uses ground towers to transmit signal in addition to satellite in poor reception areas and my area is apparently one of those because XM has dead spots every half a mile around here, while Sirius still works perfectly.

 

 

All that and if you have eighter one say XM you can't add a Sierius radio for the $6.00 a month fee or vise versa with Serius, which I have in the house and in the wifes Mustang, they will not allow me to add the truck for $6.00 per month.....they want full price for the XM....I told them they could take the XM and keep it. They have said for alm ost 2 years they would combine and allow the radios to be added like this and still has not happened.

 

Serius also has better customer service....I have no idea why but they do!!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Rockweiler Enthusiast

Rockweiler

Posted
Posted

I'm happy to help here because when I bought my truck back in August I searched all over the place to figure out how to do this. The guys at TSS radio were EXTREMELY helpful and gave me all the info I needed.

 

As you've already discovered the kit above does NOT work on 2010+ GMT-900s. The kit you need is this one:

 

TSS Radio - Sirius Integration

 

It's pricey but it works flawlessly. The artist/song info is displayed on the HU, you can browse by category, works with steering wheel controls etc.. essentially the same functionality as the OEM XM radio.

 

Couple of points:

1) "XM" is still displayed on the HU.. not that it matters.

2) You cannot use the factory satellite antenna, you need to use a magnet one similar to one you might have had with a previous plug and play radio (in fact, I used the one that I had already routed through the headliner and out the third brake light before I got this kit).

3) Do some research on the iSimple unit.. I'm not very technically inclined, but it allows you to add a second type of connection in addition to Sirius. I didn't add anything else, but I think you might be able to use it to add a USB port.

4) It works in Canada or the US

5) For this kit to work, your HU needs to be "XM Ready". You don't need to have an XM subscription (I didn't get the 3 free months when I bought my truck), but it needs to be the model that can accept an XM subscription. I can't remember what the RPO code for that HU is, but you might want to double check that before you shell out $250.

 

Can't think of anything else, but if you have any other questions let me know.

 

Hope this helps.

  • 2 weeks later...
Jagster101 Enthusiast

Jagster101

Posted
Posted
I'm happy to help here because when I bought my truck back in August I searched all over the place to figure out how to do this. The guys at TSS radio were EXTREMELY helpful and gave me all the info I needed.

 

As you've already discovered the kit above does NOT work on 2010+ GMT-900s. The kit you need is this one:

 

TSS Radio - Sirius Integration

 

It's pricey but it works flawlessly. The artist/song info is displayed on the HU, you can browse by category, works with steering wheel controls etc.. essentially the same functionality as the OEM XM radio.

 

Couple of points:

1) "XM" is still displayed on the HU.. not that it matters.

2) You cannot use the factory satellite antenna, you need to use a magnet one similar to one you might have had with a previous plug and play radio (in fact, I used the one that I had already routed through the headliner and out the third brake light before I got this kit).

3) Do some research on the iSimple unit.. I'm not very technically inclined, but it allows you to add a second type of connection in addition to Sirius. I didn't add anything else, but I think you might be able to use it to add a USB port.

4) It works in Canada or the US

5) For this kit to work, your HU needs to be "XM Ready". You don't need to have an XM subscription (I didn't get the 3 free months when I bought my truck), but it needs to be the model that can accept an XM subscription. I can't remember what the RPO code for that HU is, but you might want to double check that before you shell out $250.

 

Can't think of anything else, but if you have any other questions let me know.

 

Hope this helps.

 

The above should work. If not I would just install a new head unit. I just Installed a new stereo and mounted my Sirius Sporster 5 in my upper glove compartment and control it with the HU and my steering wheel controls using a SiriusConnect adapter. It looks great the only problem I have is that I can't pause the radio anymore from the stereo. For an example check out my Post here Jagster101 Stereo Install

  • 2 weeks later...
gdnelis Enthusiast

gdnelis

Posted
Posted

 

Just an FYI - I purchased this model, the SIRGM2L for my 2010 back in June of 2010. I'd say it works 95% - the only feature lost was the steering wheel controls in regards to surfing through your presets with the up/down arrows on the wheel.

 

For example, the first 12 or so presets on my radio are SAT channels. If I'm tuned to preset 1 and a try to go to preset 2 via the wheel controls, the radio jumps to the first "non SAT preset" which is the first FM preset I have saved at location 13 or whatever it is. Once its on an FM station, I can surf through the rest of the presets using the wheel controls however once it wraps back to location 1, if hit again it skips ahead to the first "non SAT" preset.

 

It's an annoying little flaw that I've chosen to deal with since it beats having a "XM subscription and paying extra to hear what I want even though they merged" for me since I have two other vehicles with Sirius already installed. I bought this from TSS Radio who at the time was not positive if it would work, they exchanged the first unit to be sure it wasn't defective, and helped troubleshoot the second one to confirm it didn't work before offering to refund my money / give me a deal on the iSimple unit but the $100 price difference wasn't worth the functionality to me.

  • 2 months later...
Sykesville_Silverado Enthusiast

Sykesville_Silverado

Posted
Posted

I too am lookin to swap out my xm for a sirius unit. I have 3 lifetime units as of now and XM does not offer a group discount. They said "even though we are the same company now and we can see your sirius radios we are still seperate." So since I want to have the NASCAR channel and dont feel like paying an extra $200+ dollars for the best of sirius i will be cutting out the cancer that is XM. I Followed the link to TSS about the kit talked about in the previous post. They wrote back with a new one and said it should work for 2010+ years. Here is the link they sent me.

 

http://www.tss-radio.com/products/isimple-...GM-vehicles-GM1

 

I have this kit on order and will update the gang here with the results.

 

I hope this helps anyone like me looking to change out the XM to Sirius Radio brains.

  • 3 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...