Jump to content

MAGNAFLOWS


Recommended Posts

Posted
I am geting ready to change the muffler on my 2001 3/4 ton truck. I was considering Magnaflows with a cross-over. Any feed back would be great. I'm looking for a good sound not to loud in the cab, and some performance gains would be good too. :uhoh:
Posted

tinman,

 

Just put a Magnaflow catback on my Lightning and am impressed with fit and finish.  It is stainless steel with polished muffler and tips.  The 5 x 8 x 14" muffler has an internal cross over and is not too loud, quieter than most if thats what your looking for.  

Try www.exhaustproslinc.com for great pricing.

Posted
I have 3" catback with a Magnaflow and I really like it.  I have had Flowmasters in the past and the performance of the Magnaflow is far better in my opinion.  I really like the sound too.  has a bit deeper tone to it.  Flowmaster has that droning sound at about 2100rpm that gets annoying after a while.  Get the Magnaflow, you wont be sorry.
Posted
You are on the right track Tinman!!!  No matter what exhaust you buy it is a great idea to have a crossover pipe, or a 2-in 2-out muffler.  That should really help out more on the bottom end of the power range.
Posted
I like them so much, I put 2 on the truck. :cheers: I also have an Magnaflow X-Pipe. There are pics on my Modification page in my sig link.
Posted

As I've said before, I talked to a guy who flow and power  tested glass pack's, flowmasters, DynoMax's best (something turbo), and Magnaflows, and he said it goes like this:

 

1.Magnaflow

2.Dynomax's best(forgot the name)

3.Glass pack

4.Flowmaster

Posted
I like them so much, I put 2 on the truck. :cheers: I also have an Magnaflow X-Pipe. There are pics on my Modification page in my sig link.

I really like that setup.  That is kinda what I was thinking of going with.  I just want to be sure I don't loose my low end...

Posted
I think 2 1/4 are the smallest they go, get those, that'll create the most backpressure, I doubt with 2 1/4 you'd lose ANY low end.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...