Jump to content

'93 Sierra No Start Problems


Recommended Posts

Posted

First post!

 

So about three months ago, my '93 GMC Sierra was getting gradually harder to maintain after starting. Eventually, the truck wouldn't even stay running on it's own unless the gas pedal was depressed, and even THEN it was erratic, and the pedal would have to be pumped to keep the engine running. It was in an un-drivable condition.

 

After dad and I threw a fuel filter, an IAC valve, and a new fuel pressure regulator at it, we finally decided to rent a fuel gauge. We would have bought one, but this TBI system has no schrader valve to attach a tester to. We tested the fuel pressure, and we got nothing. We went to NAPA and bought an aftermarket "Carter" fuel pump, installed it, and voila. Truck ran just fine for three months.

 

Now it won't start, and appears to be exhibiting the exact same problem. The starter turns fine, but the car just doesn't stay running. I did notice that before the truck reached totally no-start condition, it would idle extremely low, as in the tachometer would be at practically zero. My first though was "Oh no, it's the crappy aftermarket fuel pump dying on us." We snapped on the fuel gauge and when we turned the key to accessory, we're getting a good 14 PSI. We are also getting 14 when the truck is running (again, by pumping the gas pedal erratically to keep it alive).

 

We ARE getting an error code. OBD1 error code 35, faulty IAC system. How on Earth, when the IAC valve is a mere 3 months old? What's the problem here?

 

Dad needs the truck soon, and we'd love to be able to park cars in the garage, which seems to be an impossibility... Thanks everyone! :thumbs:

Posted

Sounds like a vacuum leak too big for the iac valve to control to me, look around the TB and whatnot or spray some water or ether and see if the idle(running condition as a whole) fluctuates.

Posted
Sounds like a vacuum leak too big for the iac valve to control to me, look around the TB and whatnot or spray some water or ether and see if the idle(running condition as a whole) fluctuates.

 

Actually, I think that the opposite of a vacuum leak is the problem. I disconnected the tube that leads from the PCV valve to the front of the throttle body, and the truck started by itself and stayed running. Does this mean there is some kind of obstruction in the TB, or perhaps some other valve/component is stuck shut?

 

PCVtoTBtube.png

 

I also replaced the IAC valve because I took it out to spray it with some carb cleaner, and when I put it back on, I tightened it way too much and the thread part just snapped off the valve. Luckily my dumb arse didn't strip the threads to the throttle body. $40 mistake right here! :thumbs: But now, after a quick battery reconnect, no more Error Code 35 (although we may not be running the truck long enough to generate one).

 

BrokenIAC.png

 

So, is this really a vacuum obstruction?

Posted

Take the throttle body off and clean all of the passages for the iac system. These are known to gum up and plug over time.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Certainly as the new model year comes along and that may mean a new refreshed model such as for example the upcoming 2027 half tons and lets just say for arguments sake that current year trucks are in decent supply on the new lot and its not guaranteed but some years and depending on the current economic state that buyers may turn their nose up at the so called old stock/old model and want the "new new" shiny object. When those stars align and in this case GM corporate puts out a great discount on what is becoming the old stock as well as dealers willing to deal to get that inventory off the lot, that's when it would be easier to deal as long as, as it was pointed out that your willing to take what is there for choice of inventory in an area that makes sense to you shopping wise. What you don't get deals on or typically so is the incoming new toy in the showroom, that is where if they don't have much inventory of the new model year and customers that are willing to pay to beat the Joneses and will pay top dollar for it just because. Also sometimes there is that vehicle that few are interested in for whatever reason in how its equipped that becomes two years old and they really want to get rid of that vehicle. New in all cases and warranty the same typically although plan on changing that battery out on the older used one, lot rot of batteries with todays vehicles that draw power constantly.    I too was just too leery about buying a newer used truck as I know how all too many seem to treat their vehicle maintenance wise and up here in Canada there wasn't the used market to choose from like one would assume because of all the bull crap going on with under a year old trucks and under certain mileage being bought up by USA brokers and being hauled/driven south to be sold in the sates so the used price was too demanding here. Also a certain insurance coverage I wanted was only available on a new truck at time of purchase and not even a so called new demo on a lot could have that no depreciation loss coverage. I made the best deal I could on a truck I personally chose for options on an order so they knew it was most likely sold before it ever hit their lot so no lot interest charges for the dealer to swallow. I also wanted a new vehicle so that I could plaster the crap out of it underneath with fluid film and see if that will help slow down the rust issues we have here due to the crap they spread on the winter roads. 
    • Sure...but there is no "update" to be had.  GM has not issued any support for this.  
    • You mean it's not supported yet in the trucks. The hardware is certainly there. The software just needs updated.
    • Is the carbon pro bed still a thing? I figured it was one of those things that quietly disappeared from low take rate.   I thought Chevrolet tried adding it too...   Minimal.   Despite all the 'all new' versions since GMT-800, lots of parts still swap from generation to generation.   I've seen a bunch of GMT-800s with a K2 rear bumper on them. 
    • We still haven't seen the GMC's. I expect the Chevys to more orr less match the Fords, but with no all aluminum body and simple SBC, be significantly more affordable. I'm hoping GMC offers the 6.7 engine and lays it all out on the line. My main question? More premium GMC's already use composite leads out back. Does Chevy get any? What other frame/suspension changes?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...