Jump to content

2500 HD 4X4 Vibration - Rant


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ive had this annoying vibration since I bought the truck a few months ago. 80,000 miles, 8.1 and pampered. Assumed a tire balance would fix it to give you an idea how bad it is. Can live with it.

 

Anyways, the wife brought it in to a local tech for diagnosis when I was out on a buisiness trip. Was told it was the rear hub. Apparently the had the back on jackstands and ran it, noticed some wheel hop and assumed a bad hub.

 

Did some checking on the net and read the numerous reports of others having issues with the front (front hub issue, im well versed). Checked it out and found nothing wrong. Both fronts spin freely with no significant lateral movement when yanking on the wheel in any direction

 

Went to the rear hub. Took it apart clear to the hub. Caliper, rotor and axle out. Bearing spins like it should with no visible damage anywhere. Thus hub is a tough unit. Relatively small diameter. Cant see that thing getting bent no matter what you do.

 

Made a makeshift micrometer and inspected the rotating assembly on at least 3 axis. Found nothing more than maybe a .020" inch peak to valley out of roundness/ out of flatness. .020" doesnt seem like much to me. Its quite a bit less than a 1/32". Concluded tech missdiagnosed the issue and probably am not very welcome at his shop anymore.

 

Reinstalled everything and replicated tech's procedure. Rear of the truck raised up and on jackstands. Wheels on and ran it. Max tire rpm is idle in gear whatever that is. Pretty fast.

 

Put my makeshift micrometer and the only significant deviation I found anywhere was on the outside diamter of the tire (wheel checked out fine) and along the sidewall surface. Both back wheels producing nearly identical results. Max peak to valley of tire out-0f-roundness about an 1/8.

 

1/8" doesnt seem like much. Or is it? Tires have less than 5000 miles on them. Installed by dealer after a trade in. Long box standard cab that sat on the lot for awhile with a ton of armor all on the tires.

 

Taking it in today to have the rears balanced like I would have thought the tech would have done right from the get go. Been reading some about dynamic balancing. Going to try that. If that dont work I am just going to asssume the tires are out of round and try do a few nasty burnouts to balance the tread.

 

Any thoughts?

Posted

Your methods don't seem reliable to me. That said, .020 runout on the axle flange COULD/WOULD be a lot more at the tire tread. Variance in the side wall of 1/8" means nothing. Exactly how accurate is your makeshift micrometer?

 

Mark

Posted

^ Its pretty accurate. My guess +0 and -10. Placing a fixed object next to something rotating and looking at the variance of the gap as the assembly rotates seems like a reasonable approach. Its the same method that turbine manufactures use when they inspect turbine blades. By no means an expert. I just dont expect a new hub to be any less than this. Max peak to valley at the wheel outer rim was near identical to the max peak to valley distance found at the hub. This was not the case at the tire outside diameter or at the sidewall of the tire.

 

Called a chevy dealer and they also advised that a new one probably wouldnt be that much better.

 

Called around and found a shop that does dynamic balancing (whatever that is...apparently something new). Explained to the tech what was up and asked that he put his best foot foward. End result, the back tires were off by 1.75 oz.. Fronts were off 3.5 oz and 2.75. The balancing took out 75% of the vibration.

 

I believe the remainder to be vibration to be caused by the out-of-round of the tires.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...