Ron.s Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 My 6.2 4x4 with 3.73 will get 19-20 at 80 but actual calculates about 6% less. First vehicle in years so far off. Running non ethanol 93 adds about 5% improvement but getting hard to find. Wonder why some are more spot on? Shouldn't be that much tolerance in parts.
VMaxtastic Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 ugh.. I really regret not getting another 6.2.... My total MPG so far is 14, with the 5.3. I put 91 Octane in, and it runs even worse now. I'm hoping it just needs to learn, before running better on 91. It's only like a 1/4 tank in. Crappy mileage, and it's a dog.
dodgehemi0 Posted May 28, 2014 Author Posted May 28, 2014 My 6.2 4x4 with 3.73 will get 19-20 at 80 but actual calculates about 6% less. First vehicle in years so far off. Running non ethanol 93 adds about 5% improvement but getting hard to find. Wonder why some are more spot on? Shouldn't be that much tolerance in parts.Mine actually reads lower when I hand calculated my trip it was 23mpg 546/23 gallons Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.