Jump to content

Another networking question


chevy4x4trucks

Recommended Posts

Posted

Okay, so I've got the cable, some ends, a few boots, wall jacks are coming and basically what I'm doing is putting a switch in the basements and running a line to each room, my question is how do I hook up the cable to the ends?  I'm seeing two different standards and I'm a bit lost.  There is EIA568A and EIA568B.  What would I use for this type of setup?  Initially there will be about 5-6 computers, but I'm running cable to each un-used office, so it will be about 15-20 at maximum capacity.

 

Thanks for any help becaue I am just confused.  I found plenty of sites on how to make the cable so I can do that, I've got the right tools, but I can't find one that says which you use for what.  From my understanding the B is twisted, which is for networking only two computers together, but that may not be right.  I'm a bit lost.

Posted

I don;t think protocol really matters, As long as you are consistant and do the same thing all the way around.  Were the protocol's come in handy is if you have someone come in and work on it they know the code.

 

Put the hub in the basement and just make your cables and walla you are done, as long as you make all the cables the same you should be set.

 

Here are work we use the 568B protocol.  This page gives you a example of the wiring color scheme.

CAT 5 WIRING Setup

 

So I would use the 568B............

 

Good luck setting it all up......

:D

Posted

I figured I could do it pretty much however I wanted, but I wasn't sure, I mean, I would think if I wanted to I could make my own color code :D

 

This is going to be a chore.  I've gotta run network cable, phone line and coax to each room of this house (becoming offices) and the house is 80 years old

Posted

Generally accecpted is 568B.  That's what I used when I changed our plant from Co-Ax/Twin-Ax to Cat5e.

 

A crossover cable has one end 568A and the other end 568B for connecting 2 PC's without a hub/switch.

 

Do you have a testor?  Usually $40-$60 and worth it's weight in gold.

Posted

Yep, as metioned above, it does not matter which standard you use.  Just make sure you pick one and stick with it throughout the entire process.  

 

Shouldnt be too bad of a job.  Once you get a few runs under your belt it should move pretty smooth.  I just finished a 350 drop job a couple weeks ago...so if you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Posted

Yeah, i got a tester and a good crimper.  Hey, it's not my money anyways :D

 

I'm still waiting before I buy the switch, but there is no big rush on that right now.

 

My concern w/ running it isn't the hook up, but trying to run some wires through really old plastered walls.  Just doesn't seem like it will be easy.  The 2nd floor shouldn't be too bad sicne we're building two walls, so the easy way is to just come from the attic into the new walls.

Posted
no kidding.  I'm hoping that the plumber will run a piece of 3 or 4 inch pvc up the plumbing wall so we can run wires through it to the attic from the basement.  That would make my life a whole lot easier.  But, if not I bet I could find another way to get the wires up there.
Posted

What kind of networking switch are you looking at getting?  I might be able to hook you up with something used, Got alot of spare stuff laying around that I would be willing to part with...  How many ports do you need? what speed 10 Base T 100 Base T or Fiber?

 

Let me know and we can work out a deal.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...