Jump to content

How often should you change your oil?


Black02Silverado

Recommended Posts

Posted
I change mine every 3000 miles give or take a few hundred in either direction (just depends on when I get the time and such), but I use conventional Castrol GTX. A guy I know doesnt change oil, or check it even; he just goes by the oil pressure gauge as to when to add oil. No matter what vehicle he is in, you can pull the dipstick and it will be dry. He has a lot of problems to say the least, and the engines have problems too. Not sure why he does this to perfectly good vehicles. He just bought a '95 2500 4x4 diesel not long ago (really nice looking truck) and my buddy pulled the dipstick  on this guys truck the other day and it had nothing on it, so I dont expect this one to last very long either its a shame really!
Posted

My ag mechanics prof was telling our engines class about this friend of his from several years ago had a theory that changing your oil was a conspiracy by the oil companies. My prof said that he asked his friend to show him some evidence to back his theory, so he took him over to his truck, pulled the dipstick, my prof said the oil was jet black, and his buddy said here put some on your fingers and rub them together. the guy said it's slick ain't it... Needless to say my prof was laughing really hard while telling this story.

 

 

I change mine 3000 miles give or take a few...

 

Tom

Posted
i let the truck computer tell me----so far it's been around 5000---to 6000  miles between changes----might as well let the truck keep up with it---no problems so far :thumb:  :thumb:
Posted
In my old truck, I changed it every 3000 miles religously. My new 03 S-10 the manual says every 3k for stop and go, and 5k for highway. Being that all of my commute is interstate and highway I've been doing 4500-5k between changes. However very first change I did after 3000 miles to check it out.
Posted

Sh*t, you guys go way too long!  :crazy:  

 

I do mine every 2,000 - 2,500.

 

Yea, conspiracy by the oil companies...LOL!

 

With your Professor's, friend's, engine that probably lasted less than 100k and needed either a rebuild or a crate motor, did your Professor tell him, it's all a conspiracy to get you to buy new motors every 100,000 miles too!  :seeya:  :owned:

Posted

5000 miles.

 

Sidebar:

 

I knew a lady (music minister at my church when I was a lad)  That bought a new Mazda pickup.  She blew her motor at 47,000 miles.  When asked what oil she was using and how often she changed it, she replied..."You're supposed to change the oil?"

Posted

I change mine 4000-5000 as well (using Mobil 1).  I would go longer, but I dont drive my truck much (use company van) so by the time I have 5000 miles, its been a few months or so.  I dont buy into that 3000 miles oil change.  Over in Europe they run their cars from 8000 up to 15000 between oil changes.  This is clearly stated in the owners manual.  They seem to get just as much engine life out of their cars too..... Hmmmm... something doesnt add up.

 

Side note.  My company van is maintained by GE maintenance.  The oil change is every 6000 miles.  I currently have 145,000 miles on it without one problem.  Let me tell you, when I get the oil change, they are using the low grade dino oil as well.  BTW the van is a 99 GMC Safari w/ 4.3

 

Eric

Posted

Sh*t, you guys go way too long!  :seeya:  

 

I do mine every 2,000 - 2,500.

 

Yea, conspiracy by the oil companies...LOL!

Well I have to agree with the 5 to 6 thousand mile change for normal driving. My '89 has 279,000 on a stock lower end and still runs good. Starting to see some smoke when she comes down from full throttle but nothing major.

 

:crazy:

Posted
What type of oil do GM dealers use when they do an oil change?

All the local GM shops (Richmond and surrounding) use Mobil 1 for synthetic and Pennzoil for regular.

Posted
Sh*t, you guys go way too long!  :D  

 

I do mine every 2,000 - 2,500.

 

Yea, conspiracy by the oil companies...LOL!

Well I have to agree with the 5 to 6 thousand mile change for normal driving. My '89 has 279,000 on a stock lower end and still runs good. Starting to see some smoke when she comes down from full throttle but nothing major.

 

:flag:

And my 83 S-10 Blazer 4x4 with a 2.0L 4 cyl (yea, that's right, 4 cyl) that you had to redline to simply move the f-ing thing got 425,000 miles out of it before it ovaled out the mains on a trip home from Wisconsin.

 

That was following 2 - 2.5K mile intervals.  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 420 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...