Jump to content

Steprails: Why?

General Lee 01

By General Lee 01
in The Off-Topic Bar

Steprails: Why?  

1 member has voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted

main reason was for short passengers #1.  I do not use them except if i am looking at the roof.  All my passengers use them because they are much shorter than me and need 2

 

2nd reason was safety.  They seem to help a bit in side crashes.

 

3rd looks and also they save some rock chips

ToeJam Enthusiast

ToeJam

Posted
Posted
I like the looks, plus the wife needs them to get in.  I guess I also use them when I'm washing the rig...hard to reach the center of the roof when you're 5'11"
Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
Posted

I don't have them, but only because I don't have the money to have everything I want.  :crackup:

 

I want to get them because I want something to help blobk a little more crap from flying up on the bottom sides of my vehicle.  I don't like the look of running boards on Blazers and I think the step rails look pretty good, so by getting them I cut down on SOME of the stuff flying up but it will look better than running boards.

BadBowtie Enthusiast

BadBowtie

Posted
Posted

I got em (in the garage temporarily) so that 1) the gf could get in the passenger side, since there arent any good handles and 2) to hide some frame from my body lift.  oh, and 3) more places to mount lights!

 

-John

chevy4x4trucks Senior Enthusiast

chevy4x4trucks

Posted
Posted

Mine came w/ the avy so that's why I have them.  I for one don't use them since I just jump in anyways.  But since it has them the passengers use them to get in.  I drive my sister to school in the morning so she needs them to get in and out.

 

Aside from that they look nice, I wouldn't mind a set of chrome ones if anyone wants to trade? :crackup:

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted
It's the only way my kids can get in the truck, and they add some protection from rocks and stones that get flung from the tires.
Charlie in TX Enthusiast

Charlie in TX

Posted
Posted

1. So the wife could get in the truck.

 

2. I have a 2500hd CC. The bed is high. The tire to tire step gives me access to the cab part of the bed without sratching the side of my truck.

silverado man Senior Enthusiast

silverado man

Posted
Posted
Because they came with the truck when I got it.  And for protection.  I would rather have the chrome step tube than the rails but don't have the money now for them.
wonderl33t Enthusiast

wonderl33t

Posted
Posted
I want to get them just to make the truck look lower to the ground slightly.
95whtZR2 Enthusiast

95whtZR2

Posted
Posted

My dad has them for my mom to get in the truck...

 

I don't really like the way any type of steps look on stock, or lowered for that matter, blazers/jimmy's, I dunno why I just don't. So for rock chips what I am going to do is put some rhino liner on the bottom part, right below the bump strip down. Then when I build the bumper(s) I am going to line them also... I hope to be *bling* *bling* when I am done... :crackup:

 

 

Tom

lrymal Senior Enthusiast

lrymal

Posted
Posted

Sometimes I have to go through acres of deep rutted roads and these things help protect the side rails (rocker panels???), and floor pan when a rock or rut is high enough to touch that part of the truck.

 

Our old farm truck is beat up quite badly down there and because of these pipes, my '03 truck is not even scratched underneath, in spite of the high rocks and hard ruts.

 

Cosmetics?  Nah.  I don't care how they look as long as they protect.  I checked "other" in the survey.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 485 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...