Jump to content

401Ks


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok in about 2 wks i am going to be setting up a 401K. I figure i am going to put 8-10% of my pay plus my employers matches 6%.

 

Any help or suggestions for you that have been through it? It goes through fidelity

 

Thanks

Posted

Diversify!

 

I don't know what Fidelity will be offering in the 401k plan that your employer has. The best thing for you to do is to spread your investments to reduce your risks.

 

Good Luck! :D

 

Phil

Posted

I use Fidelity for my 403B (non-profit 401K). I was almost entirely in the Ginnie Mae Fund from early 2000 until mid-March '03, then went 95% back into equity funds. I'm currently in their Blue Chip Growth Fund (30%), Aggressive Growth Fund (25%), Fifty Fund (20%), Overseas Fund (20%), and the Ginnie Mae Fund (5%). The Aggressive Growth Fund is a fund-of-funds comprised of other Fidelity growth funds, the Fifty Fund is more value-orientated, and the Overseas Fund does not invest in Japan. I made 11% for the period 1/1 through 5/31, even better since 6/1. I'm looking for a Fidelity high-yield bond fund to take the place of the Ginnie Mae fund.

 

I'd recommend any of the funds mentioned- check them out on the Morningstar reports. Fidelity has done well for me.

 

Good luck!

Posted

thanks guys

 

also i heard you can borrow from your 401K (up to 50K?)

 

Once you take it do you have to pay taxes on it and how long do you have to pay it back? Just wondering because i plan on possibly buying a house in the next yr or 2 and i figure it could come in handy just in case

Posted

Not sure about the tax rammifications on a 401K loan, but I would highly recommend not borrowing that way. Put the money away and use it when you retire- there's tons of first time homeowner programs out there to take advantage of. Borrow from the 401K as a last resort.

Posted

You can borrow from it. Mine's through a major national investment/insurance corporation and you can borrow a certain percentage of your total holdings. You pick how long you want to pay it back over up to a max of 5yrs and the interest rate is 8%. Interesting thing is that you pay the interest right into your 401K account. There are no tax hitches on a loan-only if you withdraw $$ early.

 

Diversify and read all of the info on the different investment options before you decide how to allocate your contributions. Don't panic over short term losses and don't try to micromanage it. That's my advice-I've had mine for 13yrs and it's amazing how fast it grows, especially after the first 5 yrs or so.

Posted

After reading all the posts, I have a few questions: When is the best time to set up a 401(k) ? Would it be wise to wait a while after getting a good-paying job to do so? I would imagine doing so before you get out of college is a bad idea to say the least, huh?

Posted

I should have taken the money I invested and burried it in the back yard instead. I'd be way ahead of where I am now.

Posted

I put 7% in mine, and GE matches 0.50/dollar. My best advice is to diversify, and leave it alone.... Like was already mentioned, it's amazing how fast they grow after about 5 years!

Posted

Never plan on borrowing from your 401(k). Especially for a new purchase.

If you should leave your employer (your choice or not) while it is outstanding, the balance is immediately payable. This is money to be put away and kept there. If you are not about to LOSE your house and you take from your retirement acct, you're a fool.

 

The best time to start is early. I funded my first 401(k) with my first employer while still in school at 20. I worked for a company that didn't offer a plan for about a year and a half (which is when I bought my house, so I wasn't tempted anyway). I now work for a competitor of Fidelity in the retirement market. The offer a very nice plan with a great match and many options for investment.

 

As a unlicensed employee of a financial services co, I'm not going to give any advice on your investment choices, but do take the advice of diversifying and staying focused on the long term. You can't touch that money until you are 59 1/2. Good Luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 449 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...