Jump to content

HP & TQ for a 04 8100?


Recommended Posts

Posted

:smash::sleep::cool::lol::D

 

I've looked all over the GM main site, GMC site, the Vortec adjunct, and even the Chevy site, and they all say 340/455 for 2003, but not a word on the 2004. Only thing I saw for 2004 were a few new models, but nothing on the 8100. Maybe I didn't look hard enough, but do you remember where exactly you saw the low numbers? Were they on a spec sheet for GMC, or on a seperate page from the GM corporate site ?

 

Hope to be of more help to you once I know what the dilly-yo :D

Posted

I saw it when I was building my truck on gmbuypower.com. I selected the 8100 option and it came up 320hp and 440tq. Hopefully it's just a glitch in the system.

 

Randy

Posted

Remember guys, there is a lower rated version for the suburban. :smash:

Posted

When i went to GM Buy Power the only automobile i could build for 2004 was a Pontiac... so i decided to build a 2003.. and ill paste the engine options..

 

ENGINE

Engine, Vortec 8100 V8 SFI (320 HP [253.6 kW] @ 4200 rpm, 440 lb.-ft. [614.2 N-m] @ 3200 rpm)

Code: L18 $850.00

Engine, Duramax 6600 Turbo Diesel V8 (300 HP [223.8 kW] @ 3100 rpm, 520 lb.-ft. [702.0 N-m] @ 1800 rpm)

Code: LB7 $5,010.00

Engine, Vortec 6000 V8 SFI (300 HP [223.8 kW] @ 4400 rpm, 360 lb.-ft. [486.6 N-m] @ 4000 rpm)

Code: LQ4 $0.00

Posted

All 04's are getting a good boost across the board.

 

Engine Specs

 

Click on TRUCKS. Then choose which model. Then click SPECIFICATIOns on the left of the screen. 8.1 is getting 340/455. 6.0 is getting325/365, 5.3 is 295/330, 4.8 is 285/295. :fume:

Posted

In looking at that article, I see their DROPPING power by 10hp on the '04 big block.

 

Quote....

 

The Duramax 6600 6.6L diesel V-8 - with world-class performance in a remarkably quiet package - kicks out 300 hp (224 kw) at 3100 rpm and 520 lb.-ft. (705 Nm) of torque at 1800 rpm. An optional Vortec 8100 8.1L V-8 gas engine has 330 hp (246 kw) at 4200 rpm and 455 lb.-ft. (617 Nm) of torque at 3200 rpm. The Vortec 6000 V-8 produces 300 hp (224 kw) at 4400 rpm and 360 lb.-ft. (488 Nm) of torque at 4000 rpm.

Posted

You have to go to specs. It appears it depends on what the big block is put in. In the 2500HD its 340/455. In other models its less.

Posted

THIS IS WHAT I SEE FOR 2004 SIERRA HD ENGINES HOPE IT MAKES SENSE

 

Engines Vortec 6000

6.0L V-8 (LQ4) Vortec 8100

8.1L V-8 (L18) Duramax 6600

6.6L V-8 (LB7)

Type: 6.0-liter V-8 8.1-liter V-8 6.6-liter V-8

Displacement

(cu in / cc): 364 / 5967 496 / 8128 403 / 6599

Bore & stroke

(in / mm): 4 x 3.62 / 101.6 x 92 4.25 x 4.37 / 107.95 x 111 4.06 x 3.90 / 103 x 99

Block material: cast iron cast iron cast iron

Cylinder head material: cast aluminum cast iron cast aluminum

Valvetrain: OHV OHV OHV

Ignition system: coil near plug, platinum- tipped spark plugs, low-resistance spark plug wires coil near plug, platinum-tipped spark plugs, low-resistance spark plug wires compression, glow plug start aid; platinum-tipped spark plugs, low-resistance spark plug wires

Fuel delivery: sequential fuel injection sequential fuel injection direct injection diesel with high pressure common rail

Compression ratio: 9.4:1 9.1:1 17.5:1

Horsepower

(hp / kw @ rpm): 300 / 224 @ 4400 340 / 254 @ 4200 (L18)

325 / 242 @ 4000

(MD L18 with LRW option)

295 / 220 @ 3600

(MD L18 with LRZ option)

225 / 168 @ 3600

(MD L18 with LQR option) 300 / 224 @ 3100

Torque

(lb-ft / Nm @rpm): 360 / 488 @ 4000 455 / 617 @ 3200 (L18)

450 / 610 @ 2800

(MD L18 with LRW option)

440 / 597 @ 3200

(MD L18 with LRZ option)

350 ./ 475 @ 1200

(MD L18 with LQR option) 520 / 705 @ 1800

Recommended fuel: 87 octane 87 octane Diesel

Maximum engine speed (rpm): manual: 5600

auto: 5600 manual: 5000

auto: 4000 3250

Emissions controls: three-way catalytic converter, exhaust gas recirculation, positive crankcase ventilation, evaporative collection system three-way catalytic converter, exhaust gas recirculation, positive crankcase ventilation, evaporative collection system turbocharged, intercooled, catalytic converter system

:cheers:

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

just checked with two dealers on their puters,& one phone call to the general. bad news i was wrong!!!! the hp of the L18 8100 ENGINE IS 330HP---450FT/LBS TORQUE. NO TYPO OR GLITCH. COULD THEY JUST LOWERED IT FOR INSURANCE, OR REALLY TOOK AWAY 10 HP & 15 TORQUE. regards LIONEL. ANYONE KNOW FOR SHURE?? TKS :cheers::flag:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,783 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...