Jump to content

4.3l to 5.7l


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just have a couple of questions, im looking to swap my 99 4.3liter to a 5.7l vortec, now because i live in southern ontario my truck needs an etest every 2 years. They plug their bullshit computer into the obd2 on anything 98 and newer and see if all the monitors are ready and there is no engine light on. Now i know they put obd2 into vehicles in 96, i believe, but i was just wondering if i could get a 5.7l vortec from 96-98 and have it work with my 99 computer. If all the sensors and everything will plug into a motor older then 98. Etests are bullshit, i dont know if anyone would be able to help me with that question but its worth a shot, thanks, im also looking at making it a 383 stroker and am unsure if thats even possible with fuel injected motors, 

Snapchat-1857938584.jpg

Snapchat-56214103.jpg

Posted

It would be easier to just swap in a 5.3l or 4.8l or a 6.0 then to swap the truck over to a 5.7l. not saying it can't be done, just kinda unessacery and odd unless you're swapping in a Corvette 5.7l. The older 5.7l truck engines used a distributor and don't have some of the sensors that your 4.3l has. Also the 4.3l computer will run a 5.3l or 4.8l or 6.0l with just a simple tune from a tuner and then you don't have to worry about swapping computers and disabling vats. and a few other things that'll cause you issue.

Basically doing any sort of swap and keeping the truck on point to pass emissions, you need to swap in the same generation of engines that fit your truck. I recommend a 5.3l that way you can keep your current transmission without worries of burning it up, a 6.0l will mate to it, but it may not live long even running stock.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Posted

The 4.3l has a distributor, so from what i have been told the 5.7l will drop in no problem, with the same computer, all i have to do is get 2 injector plugs and run them to the computer and reflash it. If i do a 5.3l i believe i would have to change the entire wiring harness, because i dont have any plugs for the coil packs

Posted

http://harrishighperformance.com/?page_id=27

99 is a tricky year for these trucks, I guess the 4.3l didn't convert over to newer style wiring until 2002, anyhow you are correct, a 5.7 will drop in and the link I provided above should be a good starting point for your wiring, my bad, everybody makes mistakes.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Posted

This is exactly what I did to my 1985 c10. I swapped out a 4.3 to a 1998 5.7. But then again I didn't need half the wiring.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...