Jump to content

CB antenna Stake hole mounts???


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just purchased a Firestik stakehole mount for my 2002 GMC Sierra. Having stripped it out, bent my stakehole and generally frustrated myself out of trying to make it work....I was curious, has anyone else had issues getting this thing to install properly? When I put it in, the antenna was canting out to the outside, at a pretty good angle, looked like hell. Could not jimmy it to fit no matter what I did. Are there other mounts that help correct this? Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Posted

You may not be able to get the antenna straight with that mount. I used the extended stake hole mount since I was putting a cap on. I countersunk the holes for the mount and used flat head screws so that the cap would be flush and not leak. The antenna was also canted but I was able to bend the extended part of the mount to make it perfectly straight. Also, I sanded the LineX off of the bottom of the stake hole for a good ground.

 

Bob G.

Posted

In my 2003 2500HD, I just bought a base and put it down inside the stake pocket itself. A 36 inch antenna just clears the garage door fine. Ran the coax inside the cab through one of the vents in the back and removed the door jams and hide the coax under the rug to the front seat.

Posted

That is another question....there are vents in the back? Where? I want to run it cleanly into the cab, but am looking at where and how still. Any advice is appreciated.

Posted

Do you guys have any SWR problems with having your antenna on the side and not in the center?

Posted

I ran my antenna coax throught the parking brake rubber boot. I punched a hole through it with a phillips head screw driver. I had no problem tuning my antenna with it mounted offset from the front stake hole. It tuned at 1.3 on the SWR meter.

 

Bob G.

Posted

There are vents in the back of the cab between the cab and the box. The are hard to get through. It runs into a plastic housing behind the rear seat. I was actually pushing a piece of #12 solid strand wire (a single piece from inside a piece of #12 romex interior house wire) through the housing inside the cab and as I kept jamming I pushed the vent right out the back of the truck. I figured it would be tough to get back in, but it wasn't. I was going to go through the parking brake boot too, but the connection on the coax looked like I would need a bigger hole than I wanted to punch through there. There just isn't too many ways to get inside the cab. Another spot is a large boot in the firewall where the wire for the accelerator pedal goes through. I thought about going through this, but there is only one wire passing through this boot and that goes to the accelerator pedal. I'm wondering if GM isolated it for a reason, to make sure that no frequency from another wire ever interferred with it. Thinking about a uncontrolled surge from the accelerator pedal or an unanticipated slowdown, I decided to look for another way into the cab.

 

I don't own and haven't checked the SWR. Probably should, but the radio seems to work OK. Previously I had it hooked to a magnetic mount on top of the cab for weekend only use, and I'd never checked it with an SWR meter there. The reason for a more permanent mount was because the magnetic roof mount whistled.

Posted

OK, silly question time. I have a 2002 GMC Sierra, and if I wanted to look at possibly feeding the CB cable through the rear vents...how do I move the seatback on the extra cab forward? My old 98 would fold forward, but I have not spent enough time looking for if this one pops forward too. Any thoughts?

Posted

The rear vents on the extended cab are at the bottom corner. You do not need to move the seat back any. Just fold the seat up and move the lining aside and pull the cable through. Also if you put the antennas in a location like the corner of the truck you will transmit directionally like to the front of the vehicle becasue it is using the frame as a ground plane, as to omnidirectional if you put the antenna directly on the roof. Since I am gonna keep my truck awhile I popped the dome light cover off and drilled a hole through the roof and installed my Wilson 5000 there then ran the cable through the headliner and put the light cover back on. SWR's are 1.0-1.1 and transmit and receive a hell of alot better than when I had mine on the bed. Just remember GROUNDING is essential. More grounds the better your SWR's. 73's!

Posted

I just installed the stakehole mount from Firestick and I shimmed it with a piece of black rubber mat, cut of the extra and she's straight. For the cable my end the connects to the cb was not on yet so if you just grease the cable up, I used some handsoap, it will go thru the rubber boot for the E-brake without cutting anything.

Posted
Has anynone had luck with a through the glass type antenna? Just wondering.

 

 

I'd stay away from the through the glass antennas. I have one. It works but the range is very limited. I'm going to get a bed mounted one soon.

Posted

Word of advice on that truck...your bed is more than likely like mine, and I had a helluva time trying to figure out how to utilize the stake hole mount...it will come out canted to the outside, substantially. I just ordered up the extended stake hole mount, which allows for campers or bed caps too, but more importantly it lets you bend it a little to level it out. Most original vertical stake hole mounts will give you hell trying to get them straight.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...