Jump to content

0-60 in general?


SnakeEyeSS

Recommended Posts

Posted

Okay, I've seen magazine times, and I've seen other times. Which is more accurate?

 

Example:

Motor Trend:

Silverado 5.3 Auto 2WD 7.8

Tundra 4.7 2WD 8.0

 

Here, in another post I saw:

Silverado 5.3 4WD 9.6

Tundra 4.7 4WD 9.4

 

Are these times a little too different, or does a 4x4 REALLY take that much longer? Doesn't add up to me.  MY truck, midly modified, hit 60 in 9.5, under partial throttle to 20, then full throttle, while taking in a rather big bump in the process.

 

My main question is if magazine times should be ignored.

 

I'm new here(but have been looking around a lot), but known as 90 Silverado at chevytalk, 90 Silvverado 350-M at GM-TruckFourms.com, and 90 Modified Silverado at the vmag forums.

Posted

Welcome to the forum.  The 0-60 times posted would be pretty dependent on how the vehicle was launched and the rear end gearing of the particular truck.  The 4wd will be roughly a second slower due to carrying about 500 lbs more weight in the form of front axle and transfer case.  The standard F'stones on the 4wd would tend to not have as much grip when launched.  That might account for the difference.  Some of the other guys here may offer a bit more insight. :crazy:

Posted

Its all about the equipment used to test vehicles.  Just about all magazines are different, with some (like 4Wheeler) are ridiculously slow.  Obviously the bigger name mags, like Car And Driver and MotorTrend, will have numbers comparable with factory specs.  

 

P.S. Have yall seen the latest MotorTrend where the TrailBlazer went from 0-60 in 7.74...thats smokin!  No Explorer can touch that!  Cant wait to see what the Buick version of the TrailBlazer with the 5.3 is going to run!

Posted

Truck Trend did a 1/2t comparison last summer and the Silverado 5.3 beat all three other 1/2 tons fairly easily.

 

0-60 empty/1000lb load

Silverado 7.79/9.34

Tundra    8.06/9.86

 

1/4 mile empty/1000lb load

Silverado 15.83/16.88

Tundra    16.16/17.34

 

I don't have the magazine for the Ford and Dodge but it's at their website.  Ford was third and Dodge was last (as usual).  Edmunds.com also did 2000 model fullsize shootout with similar results:Edmunds 2000 Pickup Comparison...

Posted

Yeah, the 4wd does add some weight that takes a penalty.  Could you launch in 4wd hi to avoid tire spin and then shift back out without hurting the times?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,168 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...