Jump to content

Evernham Motorsports extends Jeremy Mayfield's con

Elwood

By Elwood
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
Posted

Evernham Motorsports extends Jeremy Mayfield's contract

 

 

October 22, 2003

 

STATESVILLE, N.C. (AP) -- Jeremy Mayfield signed a contract extension with Evernham Motorsports through 2005.

 

``Jeremy Mayfield remains a valuable asset to our organization,'' team president and CEO Ray Evernham said Wednesday. ``We have learned and accomplished a lot in the two years that Jeremy has been with our organization.''

 

Mayfield was 26th in the points and had only two top-five finishes and four top-10s in his first season driving the No. 19 Dodge for the Evernham's team. With only four races remaining this season, Mayfield is 20th in the standings and has three top-fives and nine top-10s.

 

The 10-year Winston Cup veteran, whose last of three wins came in 2000 when he was driving for Penske-Kranefuss Racing, has been the subject of speculation throughout the season that his job was in jeopardy.

 

``Over the past few years, driving for Evernham Motorsports has been the best opportunity for me to showcase my strengths as a driver,'' Mayfield said. ``That's why I'm excited that we are going to continue what we started out to do.

 

``Our team has pulled together, and were beginning to show what we are capable of on a weekly basis.''

 

Bill Elliott, who also drives for Evernham, is 10th in the standings.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Matt Parker
      Clunk when putting truck into drive and reverse.

      By Matt Parker · Posted

      I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • richard wysong
      Needing this part.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • davester
      Needing this part.

      By davester · Posted

      hit a junkyard.
    • Z45
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Z45 · Posted

      Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...