Jump to content

Lift/Tire Ratio

Mike Reitzloff
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mike Reitzloff Enthusiast

Mike Reitzloff

Posted
Posted

Ok, I know many of these conversations have taken place already, but I'm having a hard time finding specific info that I'm looking for and am hoping someone out there can help out.  I have a 2017 Sierra Denali (1500).  I'm trying to decide between a 2.5" RC leveling kit, which replaces factory 1" block in the rear with a 2" so would raise back by 1" it seems, or  Motofab 3" front/2" rear level.  With the RC 2.5", a reviewer on their site says he went with 285/60r20 Duratracs with no rubbing issues.  The Motofab 3" has a reviewer that says he's running 285/65r20 but doesn't say whether or not there's any rubbing or trimming needed.  I don't want to do any offsets or trimming.  I'd of course like to have 0 rubbing, and I want to stick with factory 20" wheels.  I'd love to go with the 285/65's if possible, but if those wouldn't fit with the 3" kit, I'd rather go with the 2.5" because I like the look of filling the fender wells as much as possible, so I don't want to lift higher if I can't run larger tires with it.  Anyone running 285/65's with a 3" kit??  Thanks for any help anyone can offer!

  • 2 weeks later...
18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted

You’ll be safe running the 285/65s with the 3” for sure, at most maybe zip tie the carpet back, no metal trimming. You will more than likely rub the sway bar and uca with both kits at full crank 

Mike Reitzloff Enthusiast

Mike Reitzloff

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That's good to hear, thanks for the info!  I really liked the look of the truck with the 3" and the 285/65s a lot.  As far as rubbing the sway bar and uca, I have to ask because I'm new to the truck world (this is my first truck), is that not that big of a deal?  It sounds like it'd be bad, lol!

18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Mike Reitzloff said:

Yeah buddy tbh you could run a 295/65 all terrain and get by, I’m putting 35 12.50 venom power terrain hunter xts on mine when I get some time off work, I’d recommend the motofab 3/1 with ucas I already have the kit and the quality seems unmatched for the money, around 400 for everything, use promo code pc10 it’ll get you around 40$ Off the kit 

9C9F834A-DF6A-4539-B1C3-B2A01DC29539.jpeg

DCB9A228-EB98-4687-8751-ABCD53D97497.jpeg

DA006DD9-1464-4F65-91AA-4C1B2F24B00D.jpeg

18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted

Also, rubbing the uca isn’t too big of a deal, just don’t go full crank lol. In all reality it pretty much just rubs the finish off and there will be a shiny spot, ran a nnbs Silverado rubbing the sway bar for 120k no issues 

Mike Reitzloff Enthusiast

Mike Reitzloff

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, cool.  Good to know!  Thanks for the input!  I think I will go with the Motofab 3" kit.  You'll have to post some pics of your truck when you get that kit installed, it sounds like it's going to look great!

amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted

Nothing is specific, all trucks have a tolerance and a slight variance. What may work for some person might not work for another especially when trying to push the boundary. Tire brands and styles play a hand in it as the same size tire between two manufacturers aren't the same exact size. That is why you search and do your due diligence on all the other thousands of threads and see what most people have works. I personally wouldn't go with what one or two people said in a repetitive thread as the people who may have your specific set up including tire type and brand may have seen something different but they aren't going to go in to 5 threads a day answering the same question when they already have in another thread. 

 

As far as the kit goes, your truck is going to hate you. That is why I won't buy a used truck as you never know what the previous owner did and took off. The 3 inch level puts you about maxed out on droop and all the other angles are going to be horrible for long term wear. Even adding UCA's the lower control arms, tie rods and CV's are going to be at pretty extreme angles. If you aren't off roading they may last longer but that is still extreme. Many people for some reason or another say 2.5" is safe (not sure how they pulled that number out of their azz) but that is not the case, anything higher than stock just reduces the life of the components. The further you go from stock the more time it takes out of other parts, just remember that. The larger and heavier you go with tires will also impact your wheel bearings as well as negative offset wheels (very popular in Texas). Just some info for you for a first time truck owner.

 

My set up I went 1 inch larger with tires and stayed P-rated to gain minimal weight and did a 1.5"level in front and 1" rear to keep rake when towing and hauling, I ended up changing the level out to Bilstein leveling shocks when my stockers were worn and set them at 1.25". If you do plan to tow or haul keep some rake in your truck, it will drive and handle better level as too much sagging takes weight off the front tires. Also remember to adjust your headlights down so you don't blind on coming traffic once you have it installed, a large level will be like running around with your brights on to everyone with an HID or LED set up. 

 

One more thing, I think your truck has magnetic ride control so I think that may limit level choices? I am not sure as I didn't go that route so I haven't checked in to it, just what I have seen. Maybe that is an option and wasn't standard? 

 

Tyler

18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Mike Reitzloff said:

Ok, cool.  Good to know!  Thanks for the input!  I think I will go with the Motofab 3" kit.  You'll have to post some pics of your truck when you get that kit installed, it sounds like it's going to look great!

Check out lmfscrew on YouTube, very helpful 

Mike Reitzloff Enthusiast

Mike Reitzloff

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I checked out a few of that guy's vids, it does seem like he has some good info for sure.  

 

*Tyler, you have a good point there.  I have done quite a bit of research though, and if parts wear prematurely, I will just have to replace as needed.  I want my truck to look tougher than the stock look.  I don't think they're tall enough off the assembly line.  The Denali's do all have magneride for the '14-'18s.  These kits I'm looking at come with the magneride sensor relocation brackets to maintain factory ride quality.  I agree about leaving some of the take in there for towing though.  That's why I am leaning towards a 3" front/2" rear kit.  That only reduces the take by an inch.  I believe they are at least 2" take stock, and I do plan on pulling a camper with it, but I won't go more than 6K lbs @ under 600 lb tongue weight, so I'm hoping that wouldn't cause me to squat.  ???  It seems there are a LOT of guys out there lifting these things though, so I would think more of them would be mentioning problems if they were common with these kits.  Idk, maybe I'm wrong there.  

18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, Mike Reitzloff said:

I checked out a few of that guy's vids, it does seem like he has some good info for sure.  

 

*Tyler, you have a good point there.  I have done quite a bit of research though, and if parts wear prematurely, I will just have to replace as needed.  I want my truck to look tougher than the stock look.  I don't think they're tall enough off the assembly line.  The Denali's do all have magneride for the '14-'18s.  These kits I'm looking at come with the magneride sensor relocation brackets to maintain factory ride quality.  I agree about leaving some of the take in there for towing though.  That's why I am leaning towards a 3" front/2" rear kit.  That only reduces the take by an inch.  I believe they are at least 2" take stock, and I do plan on pulling a camper with it, but I won't go more than 6K lbs @ under 600 lb tongue weight, so I'm hoping that wouldn't cause me to squat.  ???  It seems there are a LOT of guys out there lifting these things though, so I would think more of them would be mentioning problems if they were common with these kits.  Idk, maybe I'm wrong there.  

1-2” of rake will be fine for towing your camper assuming you have a load leveling hitch, just make sure to check what control arms you have, the stamped steel are dangerous with the larger leveling kits due to lack of ball joint support, and some people suggest new ucas for aluminum also 

Mike Reitzloff Enthusiast

Mike Reitzloff

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm trying to find out what UCA's I have still.  I feel like this stuff is way more complicated than it needs to be.  I just wan to make my truck taller.  I feel like the guys that make the lifts should be able to tell me exactly what I need to accomplish that without screwing crap up.  The Motofab UCA's say they don't fit Denali's.  So I will have to do some more digging around to find out I guess.  Thanks for the info though!  This is definitely helping!

18redhot Enthusiast

18redhot

Posted
Posted
On 10/26/2020 at 10:29 AM, Mike Reitzloff said:

I'm trying to find out what UCA's I have still.  I feel like this stuff is way more complicated than it needs to be.  I just wan to make my truck taller.  I feel like the guys that make the lifts should be able to tell me exactly what I need to accomplish that without screwing crap up.  The Motofab UCA's say they don't fit Denali's.  So I will have to do some more digging around to find out I guess.  Thanks for the info though!  This is definitely helping!

https://www.readylift.com/blog/2017/07/11/upper-control-arms/

 

this should help ya out bud, best to do all the research you can so you don’t get your truck torn apart and run into something that will have you scratching your head. Pm me if you want I’d be glad to help walk you through it 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...