Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No, you didn't get a lemon. 

 

Yes, there has been a rash of AFM/DFM lifter failures in the past year.  Dealer will fix it and it will be all good again.  Typically its a lifter or lifters, plus any bent pushrods.  If you have a cylinder fail on each bank, dealer will replace all 16 lifters.  If one bank had the failure, that entire one bank will get 8 lifters.

Edited by newdude
Posted

Happened to me around 5,000 miles.  2021 Suburban z71 5.3.  

 

First time left bank, 3 weeks later right bank..  

 

Almomst 3 weeks in the shop.

 

Seems to be good now!

Posted
17 hours ago, Rich Hanley said:

Pretty severe bend in the push rod. Is there a way to disable the DFM system and/or is GM issuing a recall?

 

 

 

No recall.  Not sure what GM has layed out for any plans other than fixing the ones that break.  

 

None of the AFM/DFM disable devices work on Tahoe/Suburban/Yukon/Escalade.  These SUV's are on GMs all new Vehicle Intelligence Platform or VIP which replaces Global A architecture for vehicle electronics and module communications.  The ECMs have not been "cracked" if you will, nor has anyone validated fitment of devices like the Pulsar LT to work.  

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

There is another thread on this.  It speaks to the errors that are shown when this happens.  My truck has been at the dealership for over a month now.  Still waiting on parts.  There is nothing I or they can do but wait on GM to deliver.  The sad thing is that they knew exactly what was wrong when I dropped it off.  

Posted

Been in for 21 days now.  Just hear from dealer. Parts will be in tomorrow.  Replacing all 16 and guides.  Looking forward to having my brand new truck back!  

Posted

I just got the call from the dealership.  My truck is ready.  I stopped by there the other day and spoke to the technician.  He had them order parts for all cylinders so the top of the engine was completely tore down while I was there.

GM suggested that I test drive the truck with the technician so I could point out anything that I thought was not normal.

I also spoke to GM about lemon law and options.  They said they were working on rebuilding trust in GM vehicles and were willing to discuss reimbursement option if I decided not to follow the lemon law route.

 

If all is well and accepted, it will have been at the dealership for 38 days.

Posted

Make sure they put a new serpentine belt on after the repair. The dealership did not do that for my vehicle and that left us stranded on the highway for 5 hours in 100 degree weather waiting for a tow truck. Not to mention the $800 for towing, lodging and repair at another Chevrolet dealership. Could have easily been avoided…

Posted

They did not put a new belt on.  What would warrant a new belt?  I am not at all saying you are wrong.  Just curious why?

 

Posted

GM is offering me compensation.

Just not sure if I should try to lemon law my truck, even though I guess it is fixed now.

Or, maybe try to exercise a buy back or something like that.  Only problem is, trucks a pretty slim pickens right now.

Posted
1 hour ago, Cantrell said:

GM is offering me compensation.

Just not sure if I should try to lemon law my truck, even though I guess it is fixed now.

Or, maybe try to exercise a buy back or something like that.  Only problem is, trucks a pretty slim pickens right now.

What is GM offering you?

 

1 hour ago, Cantrell said:

They did not put a new belt on.  What would warrant a new belt?  I am not at all saying you are wrong.  Just curious why?

 

If they 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

just wondering if folks have heard of offers from gm "to rebuild trust".  my z71 is in the shop for 14 days now. broke down with lifter problem and cyljnder misfire at 10000 miles and while we were on a 2 week road trip. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,091 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...