Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was thinking about getting the OEM Kicker sub and amp installed in my truck. However, when I look on GM Accessories using my VIN, the one with the amp does not show up. If I just do a generic search for my year and trim, both with and without the amp show. Would there be a reason I could not have both in my truck? I do not have a Bose system. Thanks for the advice.

Posted

The “amp” is not an amp. It is a sound processor. It is required for the non-bose system. The bose system already has the processor and does not require an additional. Hope this helps. 

Posted (edited)

It doesnt list as an option under my VIN is what I do not understand. I would assume the truck did not come with one from the factory. It only lists the sub itself.

 

Also, it list it as a 200W amp and 200W powered sub. Its not a requirement as my 2016 only had the powered sub. The rest of the speakers do not sound as good as they should without it but the sub sounded great.

Edited by Byrds8
Posted

I can find the part outside of GMCaccessories.com. When I put my VIN in on the website, that one doesnt come up as compatible for some reason.

Posted

My AT4 didn’t come with either, and I am considering an upgrade. Been awhile since I did speakers & amps. The factory unit seems expensive. What is everyone’s take on the bang for the buck factor?

Posted

I can tell you the factory sub I put in my 16 Silverado was amazing. I didnt put the DSP/amp in it though and wished I had. That is why I was going to do both with this one. 

Posted (edited)

Double check you have the correct radio in the non-Bose setup. 

 

Also, here is a video that my be helpful if you decide this kit will work.

 

Kicker part #19417166

 

 

 

E894C187-71EF-45CC-B45E-BE7288D7689C.jpeg

Edited by 1AT4
Posted

The window sticker only says Premium 8". It's a non-Bose system. I would say I could call the parts department to ask but we all know they would say they dont have a clue as to why It says the sub is compatible but not the other amp with the sub.

Posted (edited)

RPO = Regular Production Option
 

GM uses RPO codes to identify the various options used in each vehicle build including the stereo used, paint color, seats, etc.  Some RPO codes even find their way into model identification such as AT4, Z71, Z28, Z06, ZR1, etc. 

 

You can find some of the codes on the VIN stickers in the door jamb or under the hood. Also you can ask your dealer for a list of RPO codes for your specific vehicle by VIN. 
 

Once you have this info you can determine if you have the IOS radio. This is the RPO of the mid grade radio without navigation and what the previous Kicker part number says is required to be compatible. So if your RPO list shows and IOS radio, then the part is compatible. 
 

By the way I found this thread for a 2019 particularly interesting. Apparently IOS owners can buy an SD card and have the computer reprogrammed to get factory navigation which is identified by RPO code IOT.

 

I am curious if by chance you have navigation and/or do the upgrade so you effectively end up with an IOT, is the kit (with DSP/amp) still compatible?  It says for IOS radios so does the programming to enable nav somehow make it incompatible as it’s really an IOS with card + programming?Or does the true IOT yet have other things undiscovered that make it truly incompatible?

 

Maybe the better question, do you have nav and effectively the IOT unit?  If so, maybe this is your “why”. Whatever the answer, I would frame your question to the dealer differently so you get better results.

Edited by 1AT4
Posted

Just looked at my RPO codes. It says IOS. I do not believe Nav is there. However...There is an app called GMC Maps+. It will do nav but I believe its just a downloaded app and without cell service it probably would not function. Looking up the 2021 specs, it looks like navigation only comes with the Bose system. At least each trim I looked at listed on Gm Authority only lists it that way. So I guess it SHOULD work with my truck. So now I know I am just going to aim for that so I have a complete system and not just add the sub.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 993 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep! This should be a pin somewhere as @pgamboa really dives into all of this. Thanks for reposting the link!
    • I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
    • Atlas, you kill me As aggravating as a project like this can be you have been unable to hide your fascination with learning and using that angst against this beast like a Ninjitsu Master. It amuses you, admit it now.      BTW, love your writing style. 😉       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...