Jump to content

TPMS for load sensing

Maninthesea
 Share

Recommended Posts

Maninthesea Enthusiast

Maninthesea

Posted
Posted

I happened to notice my tire pressure was up after dropping a 1,882# pallet in the back.   I was not sure how much it rose but it got me wondering, would we be able to get a rough estimate of how much load is put in the bed by checking tire pressures before and after on some known weights then in the future using pressure rise to work backwards to estimate load weight?    Would have to work the data up on your own truck since tire footprint and I m guessing volume and stretchability would be pretty tire specific and may drift a little as tires are worn down.    I am thinking about puttin a notepad in the truck to start recording data points.

jim

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

I think a far better method for crude load estimation is to get to know how much the rear suspension compresses at given weights. 

  • Like 1
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

I was thinking in terms of an objective measure of compression, like how close you are to the overload springs or how close you are to the stop bumpers. Our eyes are pretty good at estimating measurements in the 0 to 6 inch range, and especially good in the 0 to 3 inch range. 
 

I have not had enough loading experience with my new truck to be there yet, but on my old K2500 truck I could certainly tell you within 500 lbs how much was in the bed by looking at how far the axle was from the bumpers based on knowing the weights from weighed dump runs. 
 

I just think tire pressure won’t get you close because the pressure change isn’t that great.  The TPMS only displays whole numbers, is slow, and has hysteresis built in. In addition, most of the weight change is handled by deformation of the tire and increase in the footprint rather than straight pressure rise as if the tire was like a piston in a cylinder. If you could measure the footprint and the pressure change you’d get closer, but even then the footprint pressure on the ground isn’t uniform. 
 

I think we are close to seeing real time load displays in new truck, but they will be based on sensors associated with the suspension system and not the tires for good reason. In the meantime, I still think measuring or eyeballing suspension compression is going to be more accurate than trying to use TPMS.  Nothing wrong with looking at it and seeing if you can make it work for you, though. 

Maninthesea Enthusiast

Maninthesea

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I had not considered objective measuring of bump stop…….    
yes TPMs would not be linier due to footprint and defiantly would have to be on hard surface vs dirt or gravel 

I will play around with it for entertainment.  I figure to add all four tires for a total even though most change will be in the rear.

I think ford has a system measuring suspension and indicating in the taillights.  But is more of % of capacity vs #.

on my 2001 f250 I had a good idea by how she rode but it was mostly guessing.

 

 

Edited by Maninthesea

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No1UKnow
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By No1UKnow · Posted

      Well, I received a message from the dealer...
    • Atomicgrl
      ‘25 Silverado purchase- back to dealership for bumper/radio issue

      By Atomicgrl · Posted

      The no sound problem is the audio amplifier. The audio amp has a heatsoak issue in some circuitry which causes it to miss the wakeup handhake. If it doesn't respond within a certain time parameter, then you get no sound. I brought it in and had the software update, but after further testing the tech made the call for a new audio amplifer. The software update I belive gives more time for the amp to respond, but if the amp is defective then you can still get no audio at times. After the update it went 12 days before no sound. After doing some research, apparently the fix is a new (updated) audio amplifer, the circuitry internally has been improved to better deal with heat. I had to wait 2 1/2 weeks because at the time, it was on backorder with no eta. Well the amp came in earlier this week. I had the amp and programming work done today. After picking it up I stopped at a few places, and whenever I started my truck, the audio was on instantly, so whatever they did it appears to work because it's never had sound that quickly......Hope this helps
    • Jus Cruisin
      Rear Crew Cab Door Wont Open

      By Jus Cruisin · Posted

      Make sure the latch mechanism is properly greased. Look at the catch for fresh marks/scratches. And see if it has moved a little, too. 
    • PBNB
      Thoughts on these wheels?

      By PBNB · Posted

      I have the 18" black mutilspoke wheels that came with my truck. I like them as they are very subdued and look good with the 295/70's    I am sure that the next set of wheels I get will be some after market all black wheels. Or maybe some AT4X wheels.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Interesting question which you partly answered in the word 'potentially'. I think that is going to be a 'point of reference' inquiry. What are the touchstones?    This will sound petty but it is the main source of end fighting in threads on this topic. Define a motors "Life". Think about the various arguments that have been entertained on these pages in that very argument.    I can only speak from my viewpoint. Engine "Life" in my world is defined by power cylinder integrity. For the majority of engines it is the bore/ring interface that quits first. Loss of seal. Oil consumption and loss of power. Most Pro motor builders would agree and there is a good deal of information on using "Leak Down" as a primary indicator of bore integrity. At home a compression test is more the thing. If we can agree on that then I think CC Jensen has done its homework and I'd find it valid.    Now by my own definition, Dizzy, wife's Ecotec 2.4 I-4 has been dead since about 80K miles. And yet we have logged over 200K miles more on it. "Life" and "Usefulness" are therefore independent.      I know a mature fella right now who has just hit 300K on a Mitsubishi 3A92 NA MPFI motor and has done compression test every 100K. It was 205 psi after break in and is now about 195 and still even. He uses shelf oil but good filters and adheres to a 3K mile OCI. He even do UOA's on each of them for the first 50K.      I also know a fleet mechanic with that same motor that gets 300 to 500 K out of them but the are oil using, wristpin sloppy, skirt slapping motors. He ran one with a piston pin so loose the piston was bouncing off the cylinder head for about 20K miles before he called TOD. Both of them claim success.         

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...