Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought a new 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 Ultimate pickup in February and now only have 840 miles on it.  I have had nothing but problems concerning the "Super Cruise", when I engage the super cruise I get a "pop up" that reads "Super Cruise unavailable, no road information".  The regular cruise works like it should.  I took the truck to my local dealer for service and they said it was caused by the "Automated Driving Mapping Module was not working correctly, the ordered a replacement and it came in after about 5 days.  The installed the replacement and "reprogrammed" the new module.  The test drove the truck and said "I was good to go".  I picked up the truck and on my way home, I tried the super cruise and got the same message "pop up, Super Cruise unavailable, not road information".  I called the dealership and told them, they said it would be a week before they could get it in to look at it again.  Their service was of course done under warranty and there wasn't any charge to me.  I have driven the truck several times since then and still the super cruise would not work and I got the same screen warning.

 

Has anyone had a similar problem?  If so how did you get it corrected?  I would appreciate any and all help.

 

Thank you so much.

Posted

Do you see the white steering wheel on the dash? You have to be on a mapped road. The wheel will light up when you're on one. 

Posted

Yes, I  know you have to be on a "Mapped Road", the road I tested it on after the dealership had installed the new mapping module is "for sure" a mapped road.  I have driven on it before when the super cruise was working correctly and had no problem.  Now after the dealer installed the new module it works sometime and then it doesn't.  You may be on the same road going one direction and it works and then you turn around and go on the same road the other direction and it does not work.

 

I am wits end.....Thanks anyway.

Posted

Good Morning Phil;

 

I have in fact seen and read the article you sent about the problems & fix on the super cruise.  In fact, I took a copy of the article to my dealership and gave it to the service tech.  I am taking my truck back there tomorrow and will leave it with them again.  This problem is so frustrating and I sure would like it resolved.

 

Thanks for the prompt reply and I will update my post "if & when" it is resolved.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Just porchased a Denal with 1000 (dealer miles) and the soper cruse never worked.  The computer said we needed a new stearing wheel.  There were noe availabe anywhere.  I then contacted GMC direct and the California regional representative is handeling the issue.  It hase been 8 weeks and they claim to have located a new one and they claim to have snet and received it in the SoCAl warehouse.  After two weeks I am still waiting for tracking to to local GM dealership.   They are no Amazon,  delay, delay, who knows where it is?

  • 6 months later...
Posted
14 hours ago, Douglas Billie said:

The article you supplied regarding the issues and solutions on the Super Cruise has really been seen and read by me. Actually, I gave the service technician a copy of the story when I got to my dealership. 

Yes, this helped me a lot.  Thanks for sending.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...