Jump to content

Wheel Weights


Recommended Posts

Posted

I had 285/75/16 BFG AT KO's mounted on 16X8 Weld Stonecrushers the other day. Flat weights were used inside the tire. After mounting tires on the truck and backing out my drive that evening I notice several weights laying on the drive. Craw under truck and find there is very little clearance between inside wheel and brakes - the brakes knocked the weights off.

 

Went back to tire shop yesterday, this time they move flat weights way up toward inside front of tire and clip on weights out on the edge (inside rim). Drove great until I take it out on the highway last night and hear some chunks. Craw back under and notice at least three weights missing already.

 

Long and short, what is the best way to get these things balanced? I do not want weights on the finished surface. I guess I am also wondering how many times I have been driving around with improperly balanced tires due to throwing weights.

Posted

My wheels were balanced by using the clip on weights on the inside lip of the rim only. I also have 285/75-16 BFG's. My rims are the Eagle Alloy copy of the Stonecrusher.

Posted

I think my problems are solved. I did a search for a local shop that has the Hunter GSP9700 wheel balance system and as much as I dislike going to the dealer that is where I ended up. After a couple of hours they called in the area Hunter rep. who was very helpful. I got the impression that he was using it as training opportunity.

 

He pointed out that the clip on wheel weights used by the tire store I purchased the tires from were not appropriate for the Weld wheels. He said that some shops cut corners on their weight inventory and just use whatever they have.

 

They ended up remounting three of the four tires to minimize the amount of weight needed. I am inclined to take the stock PYO's I run in winter in for the same procedure.

Posted

I'll preface this by saying this is a long procedure and only for the foolish (like me)

 

Many GM dealerships have the road force balance system that can determine the best tire for the best rim combination for the least amount of wheel weight.

 

For a couple customers I have gone so far as to road force analyze and remount tires until close as possible without weights - You then throe them on the balancer, mark the EXACT location of weight placement and the EXACT location of position that tire is on the rim, dimount tire and attach the wheel weights INSIDE the rim with a bit of 2 stage epoxy. I think that the sticky back would be strong enough on the flat weights but I don't want to take any chances of them coming off so the epoxy goes on. Only use a small amount of epoxy so as not to throw off the weight, remount the tires and spin balance again to verify.

 

I try to get them dead on, but 1/4 oz. wont affect performance as long as it is installed in the rear. So make sure that two are perfect for front mount.

 

This procedure is not really intended for high mileage vehicles that rotate the tirs often, or need rebalancing often. (For obvious reasons) In fact both vehicles I've done don't put more than 3000 miles on a year (show cars and such).

 

Hope this helps - It does make for an extremely "clean" installation that will raise eyebrows!

Posted

The Hunter rep actually mentioned another method that they are either working on or it is already out where they mount the weight inside the tire (not on the wheel), like a weighted patch. It seems very labor intensive having to mount and dismount all the tires but you would not have to worry about losing weights.

Posted

GMCTech - how often do you recommend having the front alignment checked? I last had mine done when I cranked the torsion bars and I am wondering if it might not be a good idea.

Posted

My personal rule on alignments is have an alignment done any time an alignment sensitive part is replaced (tie rod end, torsion adjustment, control arm bushings, etc.).

 

Other than that I only recommend alignment if:

 

1) Vehicle pulls left or right with no other cause suchas brake hang-up, etc.

 

2) Tires have worn improperly based on vehicle usage. I usually rotate first and see after a 1000 miles if the rotated tires are exhibiting the same wear.

 

3) ANY time a bent component (especially a rim) is replaced under vehicle (irregardless of alignment sensitivity).

 

4) If the steering wheel is off-center.

 

Hope this helps.

Posted

Thanks for the information. I take it then that having it checked every 15,000 miles may not be necessary unless your experiencing problems.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,079 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...