Jump to content

Catalytic converter


Recommended Posts

Posted

What kind of life expectancy should I get out of a catalytic converter on a Silverado. My SES light came on. Code says it's the catalytic converter. 107,xxx miles seems early to me.

 

I've called around for a few estimates - Midas, Monro, Tuffy - they all seem to be around $800 which is about what the dealer wants. I was expecting about half that. Why so expensive?

Posted

That could be normal, i would think you should get more out of it. Summit Racing has one that is a direct fit. It is made by Catco. They are the same company that a lot of the Muff shops use. The part number is CTO-9063. The price is 270.39 plus an 8.95 handeling charge. This is good for your truck unless your in Cali. if thats the case cant help ya out.

Posted

I thought GM had a 5 yr. warranty on emmision components such as a C.V. Years ago they did, maybe not any longer...

 

There is an outfit in Rock Hill S.C. that custom makes catalytic converters for about $150.00 each. Sorry, I can't remember the name. I'm out of town right now and will try to find the name when I return. He sell's them at Custom Auto show and I'm sure he told me that they were legal in all 50 states.

Posted
I thought GM had a 5 yr. warranty on emmision components such as a C.V. Years ago they did, maybe not any longer...

 

Up to 1994, it was 5/50 on emissions, but The "official" federally required emission warranty is only 2/24 as of 1995, believe it or not. However, since you have a 3/36 bumper to bumper warranty, emissions are covered for that long along with the rest of the truck.

 

There is also a federally required 8/80 warranty on the catalytic converter and PCM, but since he's over 100,000 miles, he's way beyond that too.

Posted
I thought GM had a 5 yr. warranty on emmision components such as a C.V. Years ago they did, maybe not any longer...

 

Up to 1994, it was 5/50 on emissions, but The "official" federally required emission warranty is only 2/24 as of 1995, believe it or not. However, since you have a 3/36 bumper to bumper warranty, emissions are covered for that long along with the rest of the truck.

 

There is also a federally required 8/80 warranty on the catalytic converter and PCM, but since he's over 100,000 miles, he's way beyond that too.

 

 

 

 

Mine are gone to on my 98 5.7. They went at 130000km

$570.00 for both installed.

Posted

Does that system have a rear O2 sensor to test catalyst efficiency? Personally, I'm leaning toward cat, since if the O2 was bad, it should throw a code. There could be a fault in the PCM, but not as likely as a cat failure.

Posted
Does that system have a rear O2 sensor to test catalyst efficiency? Personally, I'm leaning toward cat, since if the O2 was bad, it should throw a code. There could be a fault in the PCM, but not as likely as a cat failure.

 

 

 

 

My 1999 NBS had the issue. Here are the mileage #'s

 

34,000=Drivers Side

52,000=Drivers Side

76,000=Passenger Side

92,000=Drivers Side

160,000=Drivers Side

Posted
Does that system have a rear O2 sensor to test catalyst efficiency? Personally, I'm leaning toward cat, since if the O2 was bad, it should throw a code. There could be a fault in the PCM, but not as likely as a cat failure.

 

 

 

 

My 1999 NBS had the issue. Here are the mileage #'s

 

34,000=Drivers Side

52,000=Drivers Side

76,000=Passenger Side

92,000=Drivers Side

160,000=Drivers Side

 

 

 

 

Wow! Are those cat converter replacement mileages or 02 sensor replacement mileages? That driver's side really likes to quit on ya!

Posted

Those were all Catalytic Converters. I kept getting efficiency codes. SO I swapped my passenger and drivers sides around and it still gave the same efficiency code for the same bank. I ended up changing the O2's anyway at 100,000 miles, but the converters always looked bad. The "honeycomb" insides were filled with somekind of white dried on crap. I dunno what it was. I used Texaco Fuel most of the time and have been known for high sulphur content, maybe that is what it was.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 922 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...