Jump to content

Keep it small or super size it?


R Dogg 56

Which truck should I look at for after college?  

9 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, the college life is winding down for me. I have about 16 more credits left in 3 months at NDSU, and I was told that I would be getting a truck for graduating. I have the choices up there for all of you to look at and vote, and before anyone says anything, I'll remind you that the 1/2 ton option is something that I do not want, since my brother has two of them and my dad has one...I want to be the "oddball" of the family. (Please don't ask why, it's just my way of doing things.) And, the 3/4 ton option is one that I may consider, but not at this time. So without further ado, please vote and let me know what you guys and gals think I should look at getting. All comments* should include pros and cons of each, what the "trouble-spots" are on the trucks that I should be aware of, and any other comments or critiques that may be of value to my exploration in the truck market.

 

*Frank S, CoolZR2, & Silverado3500: I especially need your opinions since you guys have (from what I've seen on the forums) the most experience with my choices above.

 

Thanks to all who participate!!!! :thumbs::thumbs::lol:

Posted

I have a 1/2 ton and really do not have any pros or cons on the two types of trucks you have listed but I would say go BIG. Ok one of the pros would be you could have the BIGGEST truck in your family :thumbs: and the con side would be paying for the gas

(that is why I got my degree :thumbs: )

Posted

I'd say go big also.

 

The pre 98 ZR2's had drum brakes on the rear to begin with and according to those who have owned both early with drums and late model with discs, you'd never want to go back. Top it off with the fact that the ZR2's, while good trucks, had some serious issues and I'd personally stay away from them if it's going to be used to drive everyday or even half the time on the street.

 

Now on the other hand, if you're looking for a rig to just make a toy out of.....................

Posted

The fact that you are considering both of those trucks means you don't really need the 3500. Great truck if you actually need it, but not worth a darn if you don't. (well ok worth a darn, but not much more than that)

Posted

Yes, I was going to ask about your activities and usage. Like someone pointed out to me, if you're thinking long-term remember 6 tires to replace vs. 4. Stuff like that adds up. But of course at 6'5, I'd say go big.

Posted

I had a '94 ZR2,and I loved it! If it would of had more room I would have kept it longer (It was a reg.cab,ext.cabs wasn't avail.until '95) It was like all my other trucks,very reliable.The big issue with them (Or any late S10 4x4) is the lower ball joints,they don't seem to last very long,other then that their very stout little trucks.

My only question is that your looking at one extreme (Small 4x4) to another (Big huge 4x4!) Why? Like others have said,decide what your going to do with the truck,If your not towing or hauling heavy loads the dually is going to be a waist of money and certinely is not a practical truck just for going to town for groceries or going to the bank,which brings me to another issue.....Ever try to drive a dually through some of these bank or fast-food drive-thrus? Or try to park one in town? Not to easy as I have driven quite a few,you always have to watch the fenders sticking out! You get used to it after awhile though,it just takes time and you have to remember the fenders are there :D

Good luck on your decision and keep us up to date on what your doing and why. :thumbs:

Posted

I would go big, but a 3500 crewcab, long bed, dually is really big. If it's just you & 1 passenger max and you're not doing serious hauling / towing, I'd go with a 3/4 ton extended cab short bed (or long bed if you prefer).

Posted

How long have you been wanting a 3500? :D

 

You would be disapointed in the long run if you went small.

Posted

Sorry.

 

You guys are right in saying that I should have listed what I would be doing to warrant going with the one tonner. I guess I would be using it as more of a daily driver than a real workhorse. I would have a chance to tow horse and livestock trailers, our 17' Maxum boat, and some light/medium duty farm equipment, like my dad's JD 630, but those instances may be few and far between.

 

It it also clear that my options aren't logical for my "activities". Some have asked why I would really feel the need to have a truck as big as the 3500. I don't know, I just have always wanted the biggest and most powerful truck there is. But, as time goes by, one must look at the logic and reasoning behind everything. And for a daily driver, the tonner is not the right choice. And for that matter, the smaller ZR2 would also not be a good choice as it can't tow very much weight, and the ball joint issues plague this truck.

 

Looks like my poll was pointless, huh? Well, c'est la vie (sp?). Should we erase this thread and I'll just shut the hell up and never again talk about this, or should I look for a different model than the one mentioned above? Looks like the half ton model is the way to go for a daily driver.

Posted
Looks like the half ton model is the way to go for a daily driver.

 

 

 

Not necessarily. If you want something just a little different than dad's truck, and you can afford the fuel, the 3/4 ton is worth considering. That's *my* situation. I factored in the fuel costs and decided that I wanted, and was willing to pay for the gas for, a 2500HD. Like Greg said in a previous reply in this thread--it's not out of the question to use a 2500HD as a daily driver.

 

In my opinion, the HD aluminum wheels on the 2500HD, and the taller frame and front bumper, and the "bumped" hood, all set it apart from its 1/2 ton brethren. Put some 285's on those stock aluminum wheels, change out the factory sound system, and whatever else floats your boat. Make your truck personalized. The 2500HD is a good place to start.

 

Click on "view vehicles" under my ID on the left side of the screen to see my 2500HD extended cab--mine is a daily driver.

Posted
Sorry.

 

You guys are right in saying that I should have listed what I would be doing to warrant going with the one tonner.

 

 

 

 

No need to apologize, nor justify your reasoning, you wanted one. That should be enough reasoning for anyone. If you want something, who cares if you need it or not, as long as you can afford it.

Posted

Marshal is right. No need for your apologies.

 

Case in point..... I am planning on up-sizing to the 2500-3500 sometime in the forseeable future. My next Truck is either going to be:

 

'99-'03 F-250 Superduty 7.3L Diesel

 

'98-'01Dodge Ram 2500 (Or 3500 Dually, yet to decide there) with the Cummins.

 

-'01 or '02 2500HD with the Duramax Diesel.

 

 

How much do I plan on hauling? Not much at all.

 

The only thing I'll listen to from the guys (no offense meant to anybody)is which of the 3 I should be more inclined to buy. I won't let anybody here deter me from getting a 3/4 Ton. And niether should you. ....If indeed that's what you truly want.

 

 

Now I have some more advice, I do not have Hi-rider or ZR2 experience but I do have S-10 Blazer experience.

 

It did have it's strong points, but in the end, in "the big picture", I was not happy with it. I don't plan on getting another member of the S-10 family in my lifetime. Take that as you want it.

Posted

Yes,No need to apologize,I would have suggested a 2500HD,I think it would be just what you need.....a good daily driver thats easy to drive and pretty decent on gas (Well,sorta!) with the ability to tow if needed.

You did say a 3/4 ton is something you would consider "but not at this time" thats why I didn't suggest it now,but I think it would be the perfect truck for you.

You definetly don't want a ZR2 for "heavy" towing.

Now you just have to decide what engine you want! 6.0-8.1 or the 6.6 DMAX.

Posted

Here I come to wreck the DAY!!! (in Jim carry's Voice)

 

Here is My .02 cents worth.

 

Like Frank said, A zr2 is a Good little truck, HOWEVER, it has design flaws. If you are prepaired to drop a few bucks into the front end, then you have the perfect midsized truck.

 

1. - Do I love my truck, your d**n right, I have put many many hours on a 4 wheeled creeper under the ole' girl and loved every minute of it. Its my type of thing.

 

2. - If I was sitting on that dealers lot and knew how much money I would spend on this truck, I would have ran really fast in the other direction.

 

My advice is this, don't buy crap, you will find out that buying a home is much more important and rewarding than buying another car/truck. It wasn't untill recently that I realized all this, People will be more impressed with you if you have them over for dinner in your house than they will if you take them for a cruise down the main drag.

 

I have had my truck for about 4 years now, and last june I bought a new car, and got bent over by Mr. depreciation. I bought that 99 S-10 for a project and couldn't bring myself to wasting more money on a truck.

 

Sorry for jabbering, buy a jalopie, you'll be better off.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
    • *Your      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...