Jump to content

17" and 18" Rim/Tires for SUV/Trucks, Chicago Area


terrytcl

Recommended Posts

Posted

SET#1 -

ENKEI RT6 Wheels 18" -

Wheels are 18x8.5 in size, center bore of 108mm, center caps included

Bolt size is 6 x 139.7 or 6 x 5.5.

Offset is 0mm.

Tires are Vogue Custom Built 285/60/18, tires were $175 each

tires have 8/32 of thread left

wheels have a couple small imperfections in the clearcoat, you need to up close to see them.

Paint nicks have been touched up using touch up paint. one wheel has a 3" light curbing.

Wheels were $800+ new

 

$275 firm

 

 

 

SET#2 -

GARA 17" Wheels

wheels are 17x8 in size, center bore of 108mm, center caps included

Bolt size is 6 x 139.7 or 6 x 5.5

Offset if 0mm.

wheels have small nics from road debris, they can easily be touched up using touch up paint. no curbing. center cap key included.

These wheels have tires mounted on them.

The tires are 255/60/17 Dunlop SP5000 tires. they have about 40% life left.

Wheels were $550 new

 

$200 firm

 

 

 

SET #3 -

MB MOTORING Razor Wheels

18x8.5 wheels

Offset = +25mm

Bolt Pattern = 6 lugs 5.5 pattern (139.7mm)

Bore Size = 4.25 inches (108mm)

Silver / Clearcoated

EXCELLENT! condition

tires were mounted, but not used.

some very small surface scuffs on the edge from being in boxes.

no tires, but includes valve stems and center caps

These go for $640 new at Discount Tire.

 

$275 firm

 

 

TIRES -

General Ameritrac TR

Less than 2000 miles

They are almost NEW! Perfect for impending SNOW!

$82 each NEW at TireRack.

Manufacturer's Specifications -

Size -------------------------------- 255/70 SR17

Service Description --------------- 110S

Load Rating ------------------------ SL

UTQG ------------------------------- 500 A B

Max Load --------------------------- 2337 lbs.

Max Inflation Press. --------------- 44 psi

Tread Depth Tire ------------------ 14/32"

Weight ------------------------------ 39 lbs.

Rim Width Range ------------------ 6.5-8.5"

Meas. Rim Width ------------------- 7.5"

Sect. Width ------------------------- 10.2"

Overall Diam. ---------------------- 31.1"

Revs Per Mile ----------------------- 668

 

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?ti...el=AmeriTrac+TR

 

$175 firm

 

 

 

GARAs

GwE4pkRx9stuQsJqkgnqEDzUgMm8.jpg

o2oiKwfLyVLrsm9J1SaaqnzixsOn.jpg

 

Enkeis

VVNRj35VoQmgmvz8RW7jbs8YJ3ao.jpg

NEMHhqWz0upkPsNGB13UsiERJmPC.jpg

 

MB Motoring Wheels -

mbmraz.large.jpg

 

 

 

All wheels will fit:

Cadillac Escalade 1999 - 2000

Cadillac Escalade 2001 -

Cadillac Escalade EXT 2002 -

Chevrolet 1500 1/2 ton 4WD 1988 - 1999

Chevrolet Avalanche 2002 -

Chevrolet Silverado 1/2 ton 2WD 1999 -

Chevrolet Silverado 1/2 ton 4WD 2000 -

Chevrolet Suburban 1500 2WD 2000 -

Chevrolet Suburban 1500 4WD 1992 - 2003

Chevrolet Suburban 1500 4WD 2004 -

Chevrolet Tahoe 2WD 2000 -

Chevrolet Tahoe 4WD 1992 - 2003

Chevrolet Tahoe 4WD 2004 -

GMC Denali AWD 1999 -

GMC Sierra 1500 1/2 ton 2WD 1999 -

GMC Sierra 1500 1/2 ton 4WD 1988 -

GMC Suburban 1500 4WD 1992 - 1999

GMC Yukon 2WD 2000 -

GMC Yukon 4WD 1994 - 2003

GMC Yukon 4WD 2004 -

Hummer H3 2006 -

Hummer H3 Offroad Package 2006 -

 

 

 

Complete set of lug nuts available

 

Must sell due to winter project.

 

Need to get these out of the house!

 

Sorry, NO SHIPPING

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...