Jump to content

The Chicago Auto Show

Elwood 2000

By Elwood 2000
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Elwood 2000 Senior Enthusiast

Elwood 2000

Posted
Posted

Went on Wednesday and it was a pretty good show. It seemed like every manufacturer there was really pushing hybrid vehicles, but GM was pushing E-85 vehicles instead. They had the new Suburban, Tahoe, Yukon, Denali, Avalanche and entire Caddy SUV line up there. The only ones you could sit in though were the Tahoes. They were very nice. The quality of the interior has jumped a lot and the design and layout is very nice. The switches feel solid, not cheap and cheesy. The dash still is very "plasticy" (is that even a word???) It looks like and is textured like a basketball, but many areas are hard plastic instead of a soft plastic of some sort. Not the quality feel I was expecting from the pictures I had seen, but still a lot better than current models. The cluster looks nice and legroom was fine in front. With the seat all the way back though, leg room for second row passengers was very limited. I would say for kids only. Of course, not everyone is 6'2" and likes to stretch out like I do either. The seams on the rig are very nice and tight everywhere. It looks like quality.

 

Overall, it was very nice. Hopefully the ride and drive is as good as the looks.

 

The new Camaro Concept looked pretty cool, but I must say the Challenger concept looked better. The Camaro is a bit too "edgy" and sharp in comparison and the Challenger seems to flow better. They also had a Shelby GT 500 Mustang that they will produce there too. I sat in a new Mustang GT and all I can say is WOW! A great looking car with the cheapest, crappiest looking interior of any car at the show. The design looks great, but the materials are very cheap and it screams, "Rattle and squeek"!

 

Sat in the new Z06 and it felt so nice, my "stick" almost got caught in the steering wheel and trapped me inside for a while, but that would not be a bad thing either!

 

I must say though, Dodge and Jeep had the best displays. They had driving areas where you could drive any vehicle that you wanted to and Jeep had the most impressive one with steep hills, water, rocks, dirt and a little bit of mud. The line was long and I did not feel like waiting, but that Jeep Rubicon was really pulling me in! The new Jeep Wrangler looks great as well. I think they did a good job with it.

 

The new Dodge Mega-Cab was very nice, but Dodges new dash style is ugly. The room was great though! I hope GM takes this into consideration when they build the 900 series crew cabs!

 

Back to GM: The trucks, with the exception of the 900 platform was dead and really dated looking compared to the new stuff. Cadillac probly had the best showing of interest when I was there for GM. They really have great looking cars and compared to their respective import competition, I think they will hold thier own very well. Many things we really like a lot better about Caddy than the imports, especially when it comes to room and comfort! Not everyone is 5'6" tall and 135 pounds!

 

I sat in the GTO and it is really a very nice car, with the exception of the switches and knobs. The interior is really nice and of quality, except for the very cheap knobs and switches they put on it. In person, it is really a very nice car and now it has hood scoops to make it look a bit more aggressive. Too bad they are going to can the GTO. It was really one of the better cars GM had there.

 

There were very few concepts there, unlike other shows I had attended. It seems like most of the manufacturers are REALLY pushing what is available to buy today instead of seeing what people like for the future.

 

The biggest disappointment of the day was the lack of a Lamborghini at the show. I almost buy one every year, but since they were not at the show, I am really going to pass on them this time! I will buy a Ferrari instead! :crazy:

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted

I will be missing the show this yr :crazy: First time since 99

 

Hopefully my brother will take some pictures sunday when he goes.

 

Id love to see the camaro up close :fume:

CHevyHD4x4 Enthusiast

CHevyHD4x4

Posted
Posted
Going to the Illini game today, if I get time, I will download the pictures I took and post on here. It was on a turn-table, but I think I got some pretty decent shots.

 

 

 

 

 

where do you live ?

 

 

sorry for the highjack :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...