Jump to content

Kicker Subs


pacx12

Recommended Posts

Posted

i got 2 10" Kicker CompVR 05CVR104

Details:

 

» 10" sub with dual 4-ohm voice coils

» suitable for marine use

» injection-molded polymineral cone

» double-stitched, foam-ribbed Santoprene rubber surround

» frequency response: 25-500 Hz

» power handling: 50-300 watts RMS

» peak power: 600 watts

» sensitivity: 85.5 dB

» top-mount depth: 5-9/16"

» sealed box volume: 0.8-3.0 cu. ft.

» ported box volume: 1.25-1.75 cu. ft.

 

looking for a amp for these guys. wondering if anyone knew any good ones. im kinda stuck i choosing. should i be looking at a amp that provides 300w RMS x2 @ 4 ohms or like most i have seen 200W RMS x 2 @ 4 ohms. will there be a signifant difference?

Posted

i got 2 10" Kicker CompVR 05CVR104

Details:

 

» 10" sub with dual 4-ohm voice coils

» suitable for marine use

» injection-molded polymineral cone

» double-stitched, foam-ribbed Santoprene rubber surround

» frequency response: 25-500 Hz

» power handling: 50-300 watts RMS

» peak power: 600 watts

» sensitivity: 85.5 dB

» top-mount depth: 5-9/16"

» sealed box volume: 0.8-3.0 cu. ft.

» ported box volume: 1.25-1.75 cu. ft.

 

looking for a amp for these guys. wondering if anyone knew any good ones. im kinda stuck i choosing. should i be looking at a amp that provides 300w RMS x2 @ 4 ohms or like most i have seen 200W RMS x 2 @ 4 ohms. will there be a signifant difference?

 

 

 

[/quote}

Unless you plan to run your subs in stereo, I would go with an amp like 500-600 watts RMS x 1. If you are going to run your subs (and voice coils) in parallel, then you will have to get an amp that is 1-ohm stable. Or you could always run the voice coils for each sub in series, then parallel the 2 subwoofers together, giving you a 4 ohm load. If you are going to run the subwoofers on separate channels then you need to get an amp in the neighborhood of 300W x 2 @ 2/1 ohms. Since your subs are dual 4-ohm VCs you need to wire the VCs of each sub together in parallel, or in series, depending on which amp you use. Parallel means the load will be 1/2 the impedance of the 2 VCs(2 ohms per subwoofer in your case). Series wiring means the load will be the total of the sum of the 2 coils together (8 ohms per subwoofer in your case). Amps make greater power with the lowest possible impedance, as long as they can handle the lower impedances (2 or 1 ohm).

Its better to have a large amp because you are less likely to damage the subwoofers this way, than say using say a 100-200 watt amp and overdriving it, causing the signal to clip. Besides, its very unlikely that you will be running the big amp with its gain adjusted to the max.

Personally I think that Kicker, JL Audio, JBL, Alpine, and RF make quality equipment...good bang for the buck at least. Just my $.02 :cheers:

Posted
Great post^^

 

I have had the most success with Fosgate amps being the most reliable/stable at 1 ohm.

 

 

 

I agree with you. My gf has the same two 10" subs that pacx12 has and its powered with a RF BD500 amp. Has been rock solid the whole time she has used it, and I know she cranks it a good bit of the time. Only thing I could add is that running a 1 ohm load on an amplifier generates more heat than say a 2 ohm or 4 ohm load. But then again, you are supposed to have the proper cooling space for your amp anyways. If you wrap your amp in a blanket to keep it nice and warm, then I suppose it will shut down from thermal overloads. :cheers:

Posted

The Profile AP1000 M may be a good fit for your setup. It produces 500x1 RMS at 2ohms so you would be running in parallel as stated by ranger203j. I have had this amp for over a year in a similar setup with no problems and it sounds great. The amp reviews well Crutchfield.com and if you purchase through millionbuy.com you can have it delivered for under $120.

 

I agree that Fosgate is probably one of the best but for my needs the profile works great and cost significantly less. Just my $0.02.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...