Jump to content

auxillary battery ?'s


sahls01gmc

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2001 2500 Sierra 4x4 with the auxillary battery. Recently I was having battery issues, so I have since then replaced both of them since I just got the truck last May, and have no idea when they were changed last. After I replaced the batteries, I installed my stereo system. My thought was to hook up the amplifier to the auxillary battery since it doesn't get used as much as the main battery. Everything worked fine for about a week, and then the amp started cutting out. Thinking it was a ground problem, I tore out the back seat and checked all the connections to find out everything was fine. While I could see the amp, i turned on the stereo to see if it worked. The amp lights up when you turn the car on, but the low voltage light turns on. After finding that out, i went to the batteries to check them. My volt-meter reads 12.3-14.4 respectively for the main battery, and 9.2-9.2 on the auxillary battery. How is this possible? Is this battery even hooked up to the alternator?

 

Thanks for any help you may have

 

James

Posted

Does anybody know what I'm talking about? All i want to know is what the auxillary battery is hooked up to, and how it works. I've tried to search this topic, but I can't find any results.

 

James

Posted
Does anybody know what I'm talking about? All i want to know is what the auxillary battery is hooked up to, and how it works. I've tried to search this topic, but I can't find any results.

 

James

 

There are two different dual battery set-ups in these vehichles. The more common setup is just two batteries wired in parallel with no battery isolator, the other system has a battery isolator installed on the auxillary battery. It seems that you have the setup with the isolator, but that doesn't explain why the aux. battery is not getting charged.

Posted
Does anybody know what I'm talking about? All i want to know is what the auxillary battery is hooked up to, and how it works. I've tried to search this topic, but I can't find any results.

 

James

 

2 dual battery options available. Check the RPO codes.

TP2 is 2 hooked together all the time. If you have this code all I can think of is a break in the cable or connection problem.

8BO is probubly what you have. This is an isolated set up. You can drain the aux all the way down without using the main. The aux is supposed to charge when the engine is running. You should have the isolating circut checked since this seems to be the problem.

Posted

Thanks for the replies. I'll check around on the wiring to see if I can spot any problems. I'm assuming I have the isolated battery too, where "should" wires be coming and going from on the aixilalary battery?

 

Thanks

 

James

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MANGOAL
    Newest Member
    MANGOAL
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 626 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...