Jump to content

2002 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 Lt 4x4


Recommended Posts

Posted

2002 Chevrolet Suburban LT 1500 4X4 5.3L V-8 (325cu) flex fuel option on this so can run E85 or gas,

285hp, auto, 3.73 rear end, rear lift gate (not barn doors), leather, heated seats, 2nd row bucket seats w 3rd

row bench, sunroof, factory towing package (transmission cooler) & hitch, loaded has every option except auto ride suspension and drop down TV with DVD player. Exterior color pewter, Interior gray and charcoal, with gray leather seats

 

Has four new BF Goodrich All Terrain T/A tires LT-265-75R-16, new front rotors & pads (2weeks ago), new battery (10/31/07) and spring of 2007 at 98,000 miles new plugs, wires, fuel filter, PCV valve, and four Rancho shocks.

 

Vehicle is in excellent condition inside and out, non smoker, one owner vehicle that was bought new, ($43,000 sticker price), has 107,000 miles on it most of it is highway miles .

 

Call Brian at (330) 872-3398 at home or (330)715-3772 at cell located in Newton Falls, Ohio 44444

 

can email additional photo to you [email protected]

post-17614-1194461130_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461274_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461300_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461130_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461274_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461300_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461130_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461274_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461300_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461130_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461274_thumb.jpg

post-17614-1194461300_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...