Jump to content

Improving Fuel Mileage


Recommended Posts

Posted

Gents. I'm new here but I've been reading this board for two weeks since I got my new Suburban. To say the least, I'm VERY disappointed in the fuel mileage. My '99 with 164k miles on it did over 15 and this one is only doing 14! Maybe I should have read this web site before purchasing or maybe I should have just set much lower expectations, but I really thought a newer truck with 9 years newer technology would get BETTER mileage than an old truck with a ton of miles on it. Reading all the posts here about this topic, most seem to point to a Diablo or Edge tuner, but that only gives minimal improvement. Has anyone "studied" or tested ethanol-laced fuel vs non-ethanol? I was surprised that my new truck came with an additional window sticker showing how "FlexFuel" would kill the gas mileage. I guess like the rest of the brain-washed, politically correct public, I just thought that ethanol was supposed to save the world. Now I find out that it actually takes a lot more E10 to go the same distance as normal gasoline.

 

I bought the truck with more options than I thought I would and I've purchased a lockpick to unlock my nav system, so I can't afford to put too much more into add-ons. I'm hoping that driving an extra five miles to fill up at a station with NON-ethanol fuel will actually save me some $ and improve the mileage.

 

Thoughts?

Posted

Since you probably haven't gotten your truck broke in yet you will have to wait until you have about 10-12000 miles for it to really start to perform like its supposed to. Check your tire pressure, reset your average fuel indicator after every fill up ( if you have the option) and drive like you want good fuel economy.

Posted

once the motor is broke in it will get a little better ... but a lot of it is the driver as well ...

 

i get on average almost 18mpg in my truck ... with very little done to it .. other then tires, a little tweaking on the intake ... and an oil change ...

Posted

Well, I guess I was hoping for 16-18 anyway. I know its not a Prius, or VW diesel but still. And as for dynamics, maybe a steamlined piano as opposed to upright I had in the '99. A buddy on mine has an '05 Silverado, 1500 4X4 and he gets 24-25 on long, highway trips. I have not had this out on the interstate yet, but right now I've got no hope for that. I have gotten as much as 19 on that '99 on the highway.

 

"Drive like I want good mileage?" That's definitely me. Now the leadfooted wife? That's a different story. It always took me a week to regain the mileage loss after she drove it for day!

Posted
Gents. I'm new here but I've been reading this board for two weeks since I got my new Suburban. To say the least, I'm VERY disappointed in the fuel mileage. My '99 with 164k miles on it did over 15 and this one is only doing 14! Maybe I should have read this web site before purchasing or maybe I should have just set much lower expectations, but I really thought a newer truck with 9 years newer technology would get BETTER mileage than an old truck with a ton of miles on it. Reading all the posts here about this topic, most seem to point to a Diablo or Edge tuner, but that only gives minimal improvement. Has anyone "studied" or tested ethanol-laced fuel vs non-ethanol? I was surprised that my new truck came with an additional window sticker showing how "FlexFuel" would kill the gas mileage. I guess like the rest of the brain-washed, politically correct public, I just thought that ethanol was supposed to save the world. Now I find out that it actually takes a lot more E10 to go the same distance as normal gasoline.

 

I bought the truck with more options than I thought I would and I've purchased a lockpick to unlock my nav system, so I can't afford to put too much more into add-ons. I'm hoping that driving an extra five miles to fill up at a station with NON-ethanol fuel will actually save me some $ and improve the mileage.

 

Thoughts?

 

Yes, E85 makes your mileage worse. Like you, I would have thought that it would be the same or maybe even better. I have a friend that has a Tahoe that is flex fuel and he won't even touch that because of the crappy mileage he gets with it. He told me that he gets 3-4 more miles with regular gas. The kicker is that the stuff costs more to buy initially anyway. I have no idea who uses it other than maybe the crazy environmentalist who think that using it makes up for driving a tank a couple miles from their home to get their mail.

 

I haven't tried a tuner yet but it is on the list. I get 18-19 with my 5.3L Silverado. Most of my miles are highway though.

Posted
Improving Fuel Mileage, What's the bottom line? Any way to do it w/o a tuner?

 

Sure!! Put a raw egg in-between your foot and accelerator. Then drive without breaking the egg. That should do it.

Posted
Improving Fuel Mileage, What's the bottom line? Any way to do it w/o a tuner?

 

Sure!! Put a raw egg in-between your foot and accelerator. Then drive without breaking the egg. That should do it.

 

An ostrich egg works best.

 

 

 

I only get 12-14mpg, then again, I use a quail egg.

Posted

i never hit more then half throttle on my truck .. most of the time i would say i have it down about 10% at the most when i take off from a stop light ... still accels faster then most other cars around me ... and then i hit the cruise when i am up to speed .. (less it is bad hills) ... i know i could tweak it a bit more and prob reach an average of 19 ...

Posted
Well, I guess I was hoping for 16-18 anyway. I know its not a Prius, or VW diesel but still. And as for dynamics, maybe a steamlined piano as opposed to upright I had in the '99. A buddy on mine has an '05 Silverado, 1500 4X4 and he gets 24-25 on long, highway trips. I have not had this out on the interstate yet, but right now I've got no hope for that. I have gotten as much as 19 on that '99 on the highway.

I'd like to see ANY proof of a 4x4 1500 getting 25 miles per gallon. Maybe downhill with a 40 mile per hour wind behind it... Your "friend" is blowing smoke up your ___.

Posted

Gentlemen,

 

I have a '00 5.3 3.73 geared extended cab with 140,000 miles. I squeak the tires at least once a day and get between 18 and 19 mpg. The magic is driving "ahead of the vehicle" that is, getting off the throttle when the light 1 block ahead turns red. You must learn to hate putting the brakes on. This burns fuel energy into brake heat.

 

I think I am correct, what do you think?

 

Ken

Posted
Gentlemen,

 

I have a '00 5.3 3.73 geared extended cab with 140,000 miles. I squeak the tires at least once a day and get between 18 and 19 mpg. The magic is driving "ahead of the vehicle" that is, getting off the throttle when the light 1 block ahead turns red. You must learn to hate putting the brakes on. This burns fuel energy into brake heat.

 

I think I am correct, what do you think?

 

Ken

Ken, I agree that your method has a certain amount of effect on your mileage. Every time you use the brake you just wasted the excess energy equal to the amount of energy that it takes to stop.

Posted

yea the only thing to do is let it break in.......my 07 NBS rado with the 5.3L got 14 to 15 mpg at the beginning but now i have about 7k miles on it i get 18 to 19. I went on a trip to houston last weekend and doing between 70 to 75 mph i got 21.8 mpg! just give it time my friend..... :rant:

Posted

Ive gotten 19 mpg on my silverado with mix city and freeway driving. I dont let the rev's go above 1500 when i take of from a light and always stay at 65mph on cruise control, always let of the gas 1/4 mile ahead and cruise to the light that i know i wont make it to, things of that nature.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 292 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...