Jump to content

Tire Pressure Monitor System


pottercon

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2007 sierra 1500 I have installed 22" wheels and 35x13.5 tires and have installed the factory sensors on the valve stems. I have tried many times resettling like my manual tells me to, but it wont get all 4 tires reset. I just want the light to go OFF. And for my display not say CHECK TIRE MONITOR SYSTEM at every start up.

Posted

Does just one not reset or what?

Did you try it in a diffrent order?

Are they showing up in the display afterward or is it just showing "--", if you have that option?

 

Dealer has a tool to reset/test them quicking, it may be worth your time to visit.

Posted
Does just one not reset or what?

Did you try it in a diffrent order?

Are they showing up in the display afterward or is it just showing "--", if you have that option?

 

I started with driver wheel and went around in the order the manual sayes to. It will set the first one and the second one ussually but run out of time on the third and the fourth. I have got the third to take a few times but never the fourth(left rear)

Posted

Try starting at the LR to make sure its a good sensor and was not broken when changed to your new rims.... (If you just want the light off you can do it in any order, the order is only for computer reference to display the position on the DIC, and you can lie to it.)

 

Running out of time is weird because the countdown restarts at every tire.

 

If you keep having trouble I suggest letting the dealer do it, most of the time we do it for free at my dealership because it only takes 2 minutes or so with the electronic tool and you do not have to check air pressure afterward.

Posted
Try starting at the LR to make sure its a good sensor and was not broken when changed to your new rims.... (If you just want the light off you can do it in any order, the order is only for computer reference to display the position on the DIC, and you can lie to it.)

 

Running out of time is weird because the countdown restarts at every tire.

 

If you keep having trouble I suggest letting the dealer do it, most of the time we do it for free at my dealership because it only takes 2 minutes or so with the electronic tool and you do not have to check air pressure afterward.

 

Thanks for your time I have spoke to my dealer awhile back he said he wasn't sure if it could be done if it didn't have the size tires on it that it came out with, and that they had to call GM to get codes, I dont know if he knows what he is talking about , might take it somewhere else.

Posted
Try starting at the LR to make sure its a good sensor and was not broken when changed to your new rims.... (If you just want the light off you can do it in any order, the order is only for computer reference to display the position on the DIC, and you can lie to it.)

 

Running out of time is weird because the countdown restarts at every tire.

 

If you keep having trouble I suggest letting the dealer do it, most of the time we do it for free at my dealership because it only takes 2 minutes or so with the electronic tool and you do not have to check air pressure afterward.

 

Thanks for your time I have spoke to my dealer awhile back he said he wasn't sure if it could be done if it didn't have the size tires on it that it came out with, and that they had to call GM to get codes, I dont know if he knows what he is talking about , might take it somewhere else.

 

The truck has no idea what size tires it has on it. The pressure sensors just sense pressure. It's pretty simple stuff. Any dealer that can't answer that simple question probably isn't one I'd have working on my truck.

 

As long as one (or more) of your sensors wasn't damaged during installation, you should be able to easily solve your warning display issue if you follow the relearn procedure EXACTLY as it is published.

Posted

He was speaking about calibateing your PCM and EBCM to adjust your speedometer(we have to do that when we install bigger rims/tires, and if they did not come from GM accessorys they normaly do not have a calibration avaliable), not your tire pressure monitor.

 

If he was talking about the tire pressure monitor... well... find another guy to talk to at that dealer.

 

You can always learn the sensors as long as they are not broken and still the factory type proper for your vehicle, and no matter the size it should still be accurate.

 

Another note while were on the subject, you have to take it to the dealer if you want to run any pressure other than whats noted in the drivers door jam(Otherwise the light will come on for low tire pressure if you do not have it near that spec). They can use the Tech2 and set it up to look for any pressure you want to run(alot of people with 22's like to run 30psi)

Posted

There was a thread about this a couple of weeks back. I had same problem after rotating my wheels. Bottom line is most guys with the 07 cannot reset the TPMS themselfs. No matter what or how you do it yourself. It has to go back to the dealer to be hooked up to the dia. computer and they use a wand to reset the PCM. There is a TSB out for this that is over a year old and they still don`t have a fix for it. After I took mine in to get reset, I asked if I was going to have to come back next time I rotate tires and was told yes.

Posted

Reset the PCM? Your dealer is feeing you a line there, it does not even go through the PCM its in the RCDLR.

 

I know the TSB your talking about, but we have not had a customer come in yet for that concern at my dealership. Here is the most important part of that TSB.

Note: While performing the pressure release method, some successful TPM relearns have been accomplished by adding or releasing air for 5-8 seconds then waiting for the horn. You may have to wait up to 30 second for the horn to sound. By only adding or releasing air for 5-8 seconds reduces the resonant vibration frequency in the valve stem and increases the possibility of the sensor sending an ID learn message. If this does not work then the J-46079 tool will need to be used to learn the sensors.
Posted

Is it me or are these tire pressure monitoring systems more of a nuisance than anything else. I can't tell you how many people I've talked to (from many different manufacturers) who get erroneous messages from their tire pressure system. Whatever happened to people buying a $5 tire gauge and checking their own d**n tire pressure every couple of weeks? Have people gotten that lazy and stupid? I guess I shouldn't be too surprised since most Americans prefer that the government take care of them from cradle to grave. Heavens forbid you should have to expend an ounce of energy to make sure your vehicle is in safe operating condition. Sorry for the rant but I wonder when people will say enough is enough!

Posted
Reset the PCM? Your dealer is feeing you a line there, it does not even go through the PCM its in the RCDLR.

 

I know the TSB your talking about, but we have not had a customer come in yet for that concern at my dealership. Here is the most important part of that TSB.

Note: While performing the pressure release method, some successful TPM relearns have been accomplished by adding or releasing air for 5-8 seconds then waiting for the horn. You may have to wait up to 30 second for the horn to sound. By only adding or releasing air for 5-8 seconds reduces the resonant vibration frequency in the valve stem and increases the possibility of the sensor sending an ID learn message. If this does not work then the J-46079 tool will need to be used to learn the sensors.

 

 

I meant to say reset the TPMS. OOPS

Posted

You know as a tech these things are a big pain in the butt. We all took the classes that told us how they worked and that it was a federal law thing. I never really looked though. I just googled tire pressure monitoring and you can't believe the amount of energy spent so that people would know that dangerously underinflated tires were underinflated without a walk around the car. "Why does my car cost so much" well one of the reasons is we are so lazy that there has to be 4 years of congressional hearings to mandate a law that makes manufacturers liable if you can't read your tire pressure from the driver seat. :lol: Ok :thumbs: climbing off soapbox.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...