walbern1 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 This was an interesting read; http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/593644.html I think it kind of shows the real costs of using E-85 and E-10 blends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAl Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 This was an interesting read; http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/593644.html I think it kind of shows the real costs of using E-85 and E-10 blends. Very interesting. Most people's rebutle is that they'd rather put the money into american hands, rather than give it to foreign goverments. Meanwhile, we are have food shortages all over the world. -al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MI 99XPL Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 Darn, the News put the article in archive and charge at leat $2.95 to look at it now. The Kansas City Star article "Loss of fuel economy from ethanol-blended gasoline hits motorists in the wallet STEVE EVERLY, The Kansas City Star Charles Kigar doesn't think twice when he has a choice of buying a gallon of conventional gasoline or a gallon of gas that contains ethanol at the same price. He buys the gas without ethanol. The reason is a simple matter of science. Conventional gas delivers more energy than a gallon that contains ethanol. If it's a gallon of E-10, which is a blend of 10 percent ethanol and conventional gas now widely available in the Kansas City area, there's an... Published on 2008-04-27, Page A1, Kansas City Star, The (MO) " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverad03 Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 Linky no worky...says the link is broken or something to that effect. I did get to the kansascity.com site, but not that story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.