Jump to content

Windshield Weatherstiping


Recommended Posts

Posted

Dumb question: but I just noticed that there is nothing across the top of the windshield on my truck. Rubber down both sides but that is it. You can actually feel the thickness of the glass. I have been in some real frog stranglers and no leaks but.....

Is this normal?

Posted

It's a floating piece of glass. I'm not sure why they felt it would be better without a strip to seal the void. $$$ savings maybe? You'd think it would generate wind noise although I can't hear any from there in my truck. :D

Posted

You can thank Chrysler for that... Pretty much all Chrysler/Jeep went that way in approx.2007 and up.

 

But.If you look close their is a black weatherstrip. It's inverted....

Posted
You can thank Chrysler for that... Pretty much all Chrysler/Jeep went that way in approx.2007 and up.

 

Thank them for what? Is this a problem? Has there been any issues with this design? Or are we making assumptions again? :D

Posted

Actually the glass is bonded to the body with urethane and is an integral part of the cab. The seal is just a noise maker.

 

It's a floating piece of glass. I'm not sure why they felt it would be better without a strip to seal the void. $$$ savings maybe? You'd think it would generate wind noise although I can't hear any from there in my truck. :D
Posted
No problem....And no assumption..As an Auto glass installer for 20 yrs. :D

 

I am assuming, and Frank (Grumpy Aero Guy) can chime in here, that it was done for aerodynamic reasons as that is the highest part of the truck where the airflow crests. Probably advantageous to not break that airstream with a piece of weatherstripping.

Posted
No problem....And no assumption..As an Auto glass installer for 20 yrs. :D

 

I am assuming, and Frank (Grumpy Aero Guy) can chime in here, that it was done for aerodynamic reasons as that is the highest part of the truck where the airflow crests. Probably advantageous to not break that airstream with a piece of weatherstripping.

 

No matter what the reason, it seems to work pretty well.

Posted

Sorry guys i didn't mean to be so harsh....Pretty much all manufactures are going this route now. ie v/wagon chrysler g.m. ford.etc.

Posted
Sorry guys i didn't mean to be so harsh....Pretty much all manufactures are going this route now. ie v/wagon chrysler g.m. ford.etc.

 

You call that "harsh"?.......nOOb! :cheers::cheers::sigh::D

Posted
No problem....And no assumption..As an Auto glass installer for 20 yrs. :cheers:

 

I am assuming, and Frank (Grumpy Aero Guy) can chime in here, that it was done for aerodynamic reasons as that is the highest part of the truck where the airflow crests. Probably advantageous to not break that airstream with a piece of weatherstripping.

 

 

Yes Your right.....And somewhat smart too..... :D

Posted

"Trim" around windshields on older cars was mainly designed to cover big ugly gaps between the glass and body. (I'm sure they also helped keep wind noise down). Now that they are building to closer tolerances, the trim can be really thin or nonexistent in places. I think that's a good thing! :D

Posted
No problem....And no assumption..As an Auto glass installer for 20 yrs. :cheers:

 

I am assuming, and Frank (Grumpy Aero Guy) can chime in here, that it was done for aerodynamic reasons as that is the highest part of the truck where the airflow crests. Probably advantageous to not break that airstream with a piece of weatherstripping.

 

 

Yes Your right.....And somewhat smart too..... :D

 

HOLY HELL!

 

NEVER tell Jeff he is smart. It will be months before his head fits through the door again...

 

:cheers:

Posted
No problem....And no assumption..As an Auto glass installer for 20 yrs. :cheers:

 

I am assuming, and Frank (Grumpy Aero Guy) can chime in here, that it was done for aerodynamic reasons as that is the highest part of the truck where the airflow crests. Probably advantageous to not break that airstream with a piece of weatherstripping.

 

 

Yes Your right.....And somewhat smart too..... :D

 

HOLY HELL!

 

NEVER tell Jeff he is smart. It will be months before his head fits through the door again...

 

:cheers:

 

 

No worries, I am used to it. :sigh:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,102 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...